APHC010188882024 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3396] THURSDAY, THE TWENTIETH DAY OF NOVEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA WRIT PETITION NO: 9409/2024 Between: 1. VANAGURU MANIKUMAR,, S/O.NAGA BABU D.NO- 14-101, PORANKI, SAI RAM BAZAR, PENAMALURU MANDAL,KRISHNA DISTRICT, ANDHRA PRADESH. ...PETITIONER AND 1. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP. BY ITS PRINICIPAL SCERETARY DEPARTMENT OF HOME,1ST FLOOR BLOCK -B, SCERETARIAT,VELAGAPUDI, GUNTUR DISTRICT. 2. THE DIRECTOR GENERAL OF POLICE, DGP-OFFICE, MAGALAGIRI, GUNTUR DISTRICT. 3. THE SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, . MACHILIPATNAM, KRISHNA DISTRICT, 4. THE SHO PENAMALURU P S, PENAMALURU, KRISHNA DISTRICT. ...RESPONDENT(S): Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. G N V PULLA RAO Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. GP FOR HOME The Court made the following: ORDER: This Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of Constitution of India with the following prayer for: “.... a Writ of Mandamus declaring the inaction of the 4th respondent not considering the representation of the petitioner dated 12.04.2024 to the 3rd respondent for immediate action required in Cyber Crime Complaint dated 19.03.2024 otherwise the offenders (International VIP Investment Exchange Group) withdraw the amounts for that I pray the 3rd respondent to give appropriate dictation to the 4th respondent to secure my amounts in 2 the hands of the offenders and to take appropriate legal action against the offenders till the disposal of the main writ petition.” 2. Sri V.Farooq, learned Assistant Government Pleader for Home, on written instructions, would submit that, based on the complaint given by the Petitioner, a case in Crime No.380 of 2024 on the file of Penamaluru Police Station, for the offences under Section 420 IPC and Section 66(D) of Information Technology Act 2000-2008 has been registered. 3. Ms.Sangeetha, learned counsel representing Sri G.N.V.Pulla Rao, learned counsel for the Petitioner would submit that the Court may pass appropriate orders. 4. Considering the submissions made, the Writ Petition is disposed of. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel thereto, miscellaneous petitions, if any, pending shall stand closed. ________________________________________ Dr.JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA Date:20.11.2025 Dinesh 3 HON’BLE DR. JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA W.P.No.9409 of 2024 Dt.20.11.2025 Dinesh