ARVIND KUMAR CHANDEL v. HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH
WPS/451/2020 · 2025-08-27
Shri Naresh Kumar Chandravanshi
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 4269 (CHH) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 4269 (CHH) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
1
2025:CGHC:43591
NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WPS No. 451 of 2020 1 - Arvind Kumar Chandel S/o Late Narsingh Prasad Chandel Aged About 47 Years Occupation- Advocate Resident Of- Near Shiv Temple, Shivpara Durg District- Durg Chhattisgarh, District : Durg, Chhattisgarh
--- Petitioner versus 1 - High Court Of Chhattisgarh Through Registrar General, High Court Of Chhattisgarh, Bilaspur Chhattisgarh, District : Bilaspur, Chhattisgarh
--- Respondent WPS No. 306 of 2020 1 - Raj Kumar Pali S/o Late Shri B.R. Pali Aged About 48 Years R/o Triveni Complex , Ramayan Chowk , Chantidih, Bilaspur , District Bilaspur Chhattisgarh., District : Bilaspur, Chhattisgarh
---Petitioner Versus 1 - State Of Chhattisgarh Through Its Secretary, Law And Legislative Department , Mahanadi Bhawan, Mantralaya , Nawa Raipur Chhattisgarh., District : Raipur, Chhattisgarh 2 - Registrar General High Court Of Chhattisgarh, Bilaspur Chhattisgarh., District : Bilaspur, Chhattisgarh 3 - Higher Judicial Direct Recruitment Committee High Court Of Chhattisgarh, Bilaspur Chhattisgarh., District : Bilaspur, Chhattisgarh RAVI SHANKAR MANDAVI Digitally signed by RAVI SHANKAR MANDAVI Date: 2025.08.29 12:52:10 +0530
2
--- Respondent(s)
(Cause title taken from Case Information System) In WPS No. 451 of 2020 For Petitioner : None For Respondent : Mr. Jitendra Pali along with Mr. Aniket Verma, Advocate In WPS No. 306 of 2020 For Petitioner : Ms. Pranoti Das, Advocate appears on behalf of Mr. Goutam Khetrapal, Advocate For State/Respondent No.1 : Mr. Santosh Soni, Govt. Advocate For State/Respondent No.2 : Mr. Jitendra Pali along with Mr. Aniket Verma, Advocate Hon'ble Shri Justice Naresh Kumar Chandravanshi Order on Board 28/08/2025
1. Despite repeated calls, none present for petitioner in WPS No. 451 of 2020.
2. Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner in WPS No. 306 of 2020 would submit that by the efflux of time, this petition has become infructuous.
3. In WPS No. 451 of 2020, the petitioner has sought relief of setting aside advertisement/notification No. 12017/S&A Cell/2019, dated
11.11.2019. He has also sought relief to allow him to appear in aforesaid examination.
4. By the efflux of time, both these petitions have become infructuous.
3
5. Learned counsel for the respondent-State has not opposed the submission made by the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner in WPS No. 306 of 2020.
6. In view of above, both these petitions are dismissed as having become infructuous. Sd/- (Naresh Kumar Chandravanshi)
Judge Ravi Mandavi