Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 42684 (AP)

VOLETI VENKATA NARAYANA v. SRI L RAMAKRISHNA

CC/4035/2024 · 2025-11-13

Harinath N, R Raghunandan Rao

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

APHC010462282024 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3488] FRIDAY, THE FOURTEENTH DAY OF NOVEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE R RAGHUNANDAN RAO THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE HARINATH.N CONTEMPT CASE NO: 4035/2024 Between: 1. VOLETI VENKATA NARAYANA, S/O. KOTAYYA, AGED 86 YEARS, CULTIVATION, R/O. AKIVIDU (MANDAL) WEST GODAVARI DIST. ...PETITIONER AND 1. SRI L RAMAKRISHNA, SPECIAL TAHSILDAR, LAND ACQUISITION, BANDAR. (PWD, SCHEMES, MACHILIPATNAM) KRISHNA DIST. 2. SRI D K BALAJI I A S, DISTRICT COLLECTOR, MACHILIPATNAM, KRISHNA DISTRICT. 3. SMT A S N RADHIKA, SPECIAL TAHSILDAR LA PWD KCO MACHILIPATNAM KRISHNA R3 IS IMPLEADED AS PER COURT ORDER DATED 09 12 2024 VIDE IA NO 2 OF 2024 IN CC NO 4035 OF 2024 ...CONTEMNOR(S): Petition under Sections 10 to 12 of Contempt of Courts Act 1971 praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit file herein the High Court may be pleased to pleased to punish the Respondent/Contemnor for Contempt of Court for willful and deliberately flouting the orders passed by this Honble Court Dt.25.09.2024 in WA.No. 113/2024 under the Contempt of Courts Act, and pass 2 RRR,J & HN,J C.C.No.4035 of 2024 IA NO: 1 OF 2024 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased may be pleased to substitute the name of Smt. A.S.N.Radhika, Special Tahsildar, LA PWD, KCO, Machilipatnam, Krishna (D) as 1st Respondent in the place of Sri L Rama Krishna Special Tahsildar, Land Acquisition, Bandar (PWD, Schemes Machilipatnam) Krishna (D) and pass IA NO: 2 OF 2024 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased may be pleased to implead Smt. A.S.N.Radhika, Special Tahsildar, LA PWD, KCO, Machilipatnam, Krishna (D) as 3rd Respondent; and pass Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. K K DURGA PRASAD Counsel for the Contemnor(S): 1. K M KRISHNA REDDY 2. 3 RRR,J & HN,J C.C.No.4035 of 2024 The Court made the following Order: (per Hon’ble Sri Justice R. Raghunandan Rao) Sri K. M. Krishna Reddy, learned counsel appearing for the respondents, has today placed an Order of the Hon’ble Supreme Court, dated 16.10.2025, in Civil Appeal arising out of S.L.P. (C). No.30358 of 2024. 2. In this Judgment, the Hon’ble Supreme Court, had set aside the Order of this Court with certain other directions. 3. In that view of the matter, nothing further survives in this Contempt Case. 4. Accordingly, this Contempt Case is dismissed. As a sequel, pending miscellaneous applications, if any, shall stand closed. ________________________ R. RAGHUNANDAN RAO, J _______________ HARINATH.N, J Date:14.11.2025 KPV 4 RRR,J & HN,J C.C.No.4035 of 2024 99 THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE R. RAGHUNANDAN RAO AND THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE HARINATH.N CONTEMPT CASE No:4035 of 2024 (per Hon’ble Sri Justice R. Raghunandan Rao) 14.11.2025 KPV