Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
- 1 -
HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:26947-DB RFA No. 831 of 2024
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 17TH DAY OF JULY, 2025 PRESENT THE HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE ANU SIVARAMAN AND THE HON'BLE DR. JUSTICE K.MANMADHA RAO REGULAR FIRST APPEAL NO. 831 OF 2024 (RES) BETWEEN:
1.
SMT GANGANARASAMMA W/O LATE RAMAIAH, AGED ABOUT 86 YEARS,
2.
SRI. R. MANJUNATH S/O LATE RAMAIAH, AGED ABOUT 53 YEARS,
BOTH ARE R/AT. D-2 AND 3, K.G. SRIKANTAPURA VILLAGE, LAKSHMIPURA POST, DASANAPURA HOBLI, BENGALURU-560 023 …APPELLANTS (BY SRI. MOHAMED KHAN A., ADVOCATE)
AND:
1.
MR K A EDMONDS S/O LATE F.P. EDOMONDS AGED ABOUT 71 YEARS, RESIDING AT PLOT NO.16 (NO.11), 1ST FLOOR, STAT EBANK COLONY, CITY LINK ROAD, ADAMBEKKAM, CHENNAI 600 088
Digitally signed by CHANNEGOWDA PREMA Location: High Court of Karnataka
- 2 -
HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:26947-DB RFA No. 831 of 2024
2.
MR. K.P. KUMAR S/O LATE PUTTASWAMY, AGED ABOUT 60 YEARS, R/AT SWATAI DOOR NO.1344 3RD CROSS RAOD, 6TH BLOCK, HMT ECHBS NAGASANDRA, NELASANDRAHANAHALLI LAYOUT, BENGALURU 560 073 …RESPONDENTS
(BY SRI. N.K.MALLIKARJUN FOR SRI. SAMPATH A., ADVOCATE FOR C/R-1;
NOTICE TO R2 IS DISPENSED WITH V.C.O. DATED 17.07.2025)
THIS REGULAR FIRST APPEAL IS FILED UNDER SECTION 96 OF CPC, AGAINST THE JUDGMENT AND DECREE DATED 31.01.2024 PASSED IN OS.No.1290/2018 ON THE FILE OF THE II ADDITIONAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE, BENGALURU RURAL DISTRICT, BENGALURU, DECREEING THE SUIT FOR DECLARATION, CANCELLATION, POSSESSION AND DAMAGES, ETC.
THIS APPEAL, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY,
JUDGMENT WAS DELIVERED THEREIN AS UNDER:
CORAM: HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE ANU SIVARAMAN and HON'BLE DR. JUSTICE K.MANMADHA RAO
- 3 -
HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:26947-DB RFA No. 831 of 2024
ORAL JUDGMENT (PER: HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE ANU SIVARAMAN)
Learned counsel appearing on either side submit that the matter has been compromised between the parties and that the terms of the compromise has been reduced to writing and an application is filed in this regard before this Court.
2. It is submitted that respondent No.2 is not a necessary party in this appeal since respondent No.2 has already alienated the property in favour of the appellants herein. In the above view of the matter, notice to respondent No.2 is dispensed with.
3. The compromise petition is taken on record.
4. Three demand drafts drawn in favour of respondent No.1 is handed over by the appellants in Court today. The receipt of the demand draft is duly acknowledged. In the above view of the matter, the compromise entered into between the parties is recorded. Accordingly, the appeal is disposed of in- terms of the compromise.
- 4 -
HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:26947-DB RFA No. 831 of 2024
5. Registry shall draw up the decree in accordance with the compromise.
6. The original documents which are produced in the suit that are marked by the plaintiff/respondent No.1 shall be handed over to the appellants on proper identification after replacing them with authenticated copies.
7. Court fee shall be refunded in accordance with law.
Sd/- (ANU SIVARAMAN) JUDGE
Sd/- (DR.K.MANMADHA RAO) JUDGE
RAK List No.: 1 Sl No.: 68