ANUSYA KANVAR W/O ANAND SINGH RATNU v. THE STATE OF RAJASTHAN
CW/19151/2025 · 2025-12-08
Ashok Kumar Jain
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 42673 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 42673 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
[2025:RJ-JP:49888] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Civil Writ Petition No.19151/2025 Anusya Kanvar W/o Anand Singh Ratnu, aged about 37 years, R/o House No.187/1, Teja Choka, Kotad, Sukar Road, Ajmer, Rajasthan. ----Petitioner Versus
1. The State of Rajasthan through its Principal Secretary, School Education Department, Govt. Secretariat, Rajasthan, Jaipur.
2. The Director, Secondary Education, Rajasthan, Bikaner. ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Ram Pratap Saini For Respondent(s) :
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ASHOK KUMAR JAIN
Order 08/12/2025
1. This writ petition has been filed by the petitioner with the following prayer:-
"It is therefore, most respectfully prayed that this Hon'ble court may very graciously be pleased to accept and allow this writ petition, call for the relevant record in the present matter and by issuance of an appropriate writ, order or direction: i. Respondents may kindly be directed to transfer the petitioner on the post of Lecturer at nearby place to her native place i.e. District Ajmer where the posts are lying vacant. ii. Respondents may kindly be directed to consider the representation of the petitioner regarding transfer her on the post of Lecturer from District Sikar to District Ajmer. iii. Any other order or direction which this Hon'ble Court may deem fit, just and proper in the
facts and circumstances of this case may also be passed in favour of the petitioner."
2. During the course of arguments, learned counsel for petitioner submits that the petitioner may be granted permission
[2025:RJ-JP:49888] (2 of 2) [CW-19151/2025] to file an appropriate representation before the respondents- Authority to consider and resolve her grievances.
3. Considered the grievance raised herein, the petitioner is at liberty to submit a representation to the respondents-Authority within a period of 30 days raising all grounds and the respondents-Authority are directed to consider and decide the representation after inquiry about grievances, raised by the petitioner but with a reasoned and speaking order within a period of 30 days from date of receipt of representation. After the decision, the respondents are under an obligation to communicate the decision to the petitioner either by way of speed post or through E-mail, if petitioner has provided E-mail in her representation. If the petitioner is still aggrieved, she is at liberty to approach this Court with fresh petition.
4. With the aforesaid directions, the present writ petition with pending application, if any, stands disposed of.
(ASHOK KUMAR JAIN),J GARIMA/206