PRAMOD KUMAR RAJORIA S/O BAL CHAND RAJORIA v. THE STATE OF RAJASTHAN
CW/19243/2025 · 2025-12-08
Ashok Kumar Jain
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 42671 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 42671 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
[2025:RJ-JP:50046] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 19243/2025 Pramod Kumar Rajoria S/o Bal Chand Rajoria, Aged About 40 Years, R/o Behind Khadi Bhandar, Rajawatto Ka Chok, Amer, Jaipur, Rajasthan. ----Petitioner Versus
1. The State Of Rajasthan, Through Principal Secretary, School Education, Government Secretariat, Jaipur. 2. The Director, Secondary Education, Bikaner. ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Ram Pratap Saini Mr. Aamir Khan For Respondent(s) :
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ASHOK KUMAR JAIN Order 08/12/2025
1. This writ petition has been filed by the petitioner with the following prayer:-
“i) Issue an appropriate writ order or direction in the nature thereof thereby the respondents may kindly be directed to include the petitioner in the counseling for promotion to the post of Vice Principal against DPC year 2023-24, when persons junior to him have been promoted in PH category and thereafter petitioner be promoted on the post of Vice Principal against the DPC year 2023-24 instead of 2024-25 and accordingly give all consequential benefits thereto;
[2025:RJ-JP:50046] (2 of 3) [CW-19243/2025] ii) Issue an appropriate writ order or direction in the nature thereof thereby the respondents may kindly be directed to assign seniority and other benefits to the petitioner on the post of Vice Principal under SC PH Male Category against
the
DPC
year
2023-24; iii) Issue an appropriate writ order or direction in the nature thereof thereby Respondents may kindly be directed in compliance of order dated 27.09.2025 allowed the petitioner to continue serve duties at the present place of posting on the post of Vice Principal.”
2. During course of arguments, learned counsel for petitioner submits that the petitioner may be granted permission to file an appropriate representation before the respondents- Authority to consider and resolve his grievances. 3. Considered the grievance raised herein, the petitioner is given a liberty to submit a representation to the respondents-Authority within a period of 30 days raising all grounds and the respondents-Authority are directed to consider and decide the representation after enquiry about grievances, raised by the petitioner but with a reasoned and speaking order within a period of 30 days from date of receipt of representation. After the decision, the respondents are under an obligation to communicate the decision to the petitioner either by way of speed post or through E-mail, if petitioner has provided E-mail in his representation.
If the petitioner is still aggrieved, he is at liberty to approach this Court with fresh petition. [2025:RJ-JP:50046] (3 of 3) [CW-19243/2025]
4. With the aforesaid directions, the present writ petition with pending application, if any, stands disposed of. (ASHOK KUMAR JAIN),J GAURAV /288