KUMAR @ MOHANAKIRUBAKARAN v. STATE REP BY THE ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF POLICE
CRL OP/9692/2025 · 2025-04-02
G K Ilanthiraiyan
Transfer Petitionbody2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 42666 (MAD) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 42666 (MAD) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
Crl.O.P.No.9692 of 2025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED: 02.04.2025 CORAM:
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE G.K.ILANTHIRAIYAN Crl.O.P.No. 9692 of 2025 Kumar @ Mohanakirubakaran ... Petitioner Vs. 1.The State rep by The Assistant Commissioner of Police, Pallavaram, Chennai. 2.The Inspector of Police, Pallavaram Police Station, Tambaram City, Chennai.
3.Vinayagam .. Respondents PRAYER: Criminal Original Petition is filed under Section 528 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 to direct the second respondent Police not to harass these petitioner in the guise of enquiry on the basis of the petitioner representation dated 22.03.2025. For Petitioner : Mr.G.Mageshkumar For Respondents : Mr. A.Gopinath Government Advocate (Crl. Side) O R D E R p. 2 Crl.O.P.No.9692 of 2025
This petition has been filed seeking direction to the second respondent police herein not to harass the petitioner in the guise of enquiry on the petitioner's representation dated 22.03.2025.
2. The learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that the respondent police harassed the petitioner under the guise of enquiry.
3. The learned Government Advocate (Crl.Side) appearing for the respondent police submits that the police called the petitioner for enquiry in the pending FIR in Crime No.55 of 2025. The case where the FIR is pending against the petitioner, there is no scope for this Court to entertain the petition under Section 528 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, under the caption "Not to harass".
4. Heard the learned Counsel appearing on either side and perused the materials placed on record.
5. Under such circumstances, once the regular FIR has been registered, the question of “Not to harass” will not arise. Any direction p. 3 Crl.O.P.No.9692 of 2025 issued by this Court at this stage will amount to interfering with the investigation conducted by the respondent police. Hence, this Criminal Original petition is dismissed. 02.04.2025 Index : Yes/No Neutral citation : Yes/No Speaking/non-speaking order drl p. 4 Crl.O.P.No.9692 of 2025 G.K.ILANTHIRAIYAN, J. To
1. The Assistant Commissioner of Police, Pallavaram, Chennai. 2.The Inspector of Police, Pallavaram Police Station, Tambaram City, Chennai.
3. The Public Prosecutor, High Court, Madras. Crl.O.P.No.9692 of 2025 02.04.2025