Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Punjab and Haryana · body

2025 DAILYLAW 42664 (PNJ)

DARSHNA DEVI AND ANR v. STATE OF PUNJAB AND ORS

CRWP/3355/2025 · 2025-05-26

H S Grewal

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH 108 CRWP-3355-2025 Date of decision: 26.05.2025 DARSHNA DEVI AND ANR ....Petitioners V/s STATE OF PUNJAB AND ORS ....Respondents CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE H.S.GREWAL Present: Ms.Jasleen Kaur Chhibber, Advocate and Mr.Amarpreet Singh Chhibber, Advocate, for the petitioners. Mr.Kamalpreet Bawa, DAG, Punjab. Mr.Yogesh and Mr.Sapan Dhir, Advocates for respondents No.4 to 6. ***** H.S.GREWAL, J. (ORAL) 1. The prayer in the present petition filed under Article 226/227 of the Constitution of India for issuance of a writ in the nature of Mandamus for directing respondents No.2 and 3 to take action on the representation and postal receipt dated 01.04.2025 for protecting the life and liberty of the petitioners. 2. Vide order dated 05.04.2025, the parties were directed to appear before the Medication and Conciliation Centre of this Court as there were chances of amicable settlement between them. 3. As per the report of the Mediator dated 08.05.2025, the parties have settled their dispute by way of an amicable settlement/agreement. 4. In view of the settlement/agreement which is taken on record according to which the parties have compromised the matter, the present petition POONAM RATHORE 2025.05.27 17:32 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document High Court Chandigarh CRWP-3355-2025 -2- stands disposed of. 5. However, in case any of the parties breaches any condition of the compromise, an application may be moved to revive the petition. (H.S.GREWAL) May 26, 2025 JUDGE poonam Whether speaking/reasoned: Yes/No Whether reportable: Yes/No POONAM RATHORE 2025.05.27 17:32 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document High Court Chandigarh