1 (VS,J C.R.P.No.3193 of 2024) APHC010572272024 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3333] FRIDAY,THE SEVENTH DAY OF NOVEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE V.SUJATHA CIVIL REVISION PETITION NO: 3193/2024 Between: 1. SHAIK ABDUL RAHEEM(DIED), (DIED) 2. SHAIK JIKRITUNNISA, W/O SHAIK ABDUL RAHEEM AGED 65 YEARS, OCC HOUSEWIFE, R/O 2-2-27 JAMEDARPET, BAPATIA, GUNTUR DISTRICT. 3. SHAIK TAJ BASHA, S/O SHAIK ABDUL RAHEEM AGED 39 YEARS, R/O 2-2-27, JAMEDARPET, BAPATIA, GUNTUR DISTRICT. 4. SHAIK KHAJA RAHAMATUNNISA, W/O SHAIK JOHN SAIDA AGED 45 YEARS. HOUSEWIFE, R/O 2-2-27/1 JAMEDARPET, NEAR OLD MOSQUE, BAPATIA GUNTUR DISTRICT. ...PETITIONER(S) AND 1. JONNAGADDA NASESWARA RAO, S/O VENKATESWARLU AGED ABOUT 45 YEARS. CULTIVATION, R/O RAILPET BAPATIA 2. DARSI PRATHIMA, W/O SURESH BABU, AGED ABOUT 27 YEARS, OCC CULTIVATOR, R/O NARASAYAPALEM VILLAGE, BAPATIA MANDAL, GUNTUR DISTRICT ...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of India,praying that in the circumstances stated in the grounds filed herein,the High Court may be pleased toPleased to allow the C.RP., by setting aside the order dt. 14-12- 2 (VS,J C.R.P.No.3193 of 2024) 2023 Passed in I.A.No. 138 of 2023 in A.S.No. 38 of 2011 on the file of the VI Addl. District Judge (FTC) Bapatla and to grant IA NO: 1 OF 2024 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased pleased to dispense with the filing of certified copy of order in I.A.No. 138 of 2023 in A.S.No.38 of 2011 on the file of the VI Addl. District Judge (FTC), Bapatia and accept xerox copy of the same in the above Civil Revision Petition and pass IA NO: 2 OF 2024 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased Counsel for the Petitioner(S): 1. SYED GHOUSE BASHA Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. P RAJASEKHAR The Court made the following: 3 (VS,J C.R.P.No.3193 of 2024) ORDER : Sri Syed Ghouse Basha, learned counsel for the petitioner, submits that the main appeal, i.e., A.S.No.38 of 2011 on the file of the VI Additional District Judge (FTC), Bapatla, has already been disposed of during the pendency of the present Civil Revision Petition. Hence, the cause in the present revision does not survive and has become infructuous. 2. Recording the said submission, the Civil Revision Petition is dismissed as infructuous. There shall be no order as to costs. Miscellaneous petitions pending, if any, in the present case, shall stand closed. ___________________ JUSTICE V.SUJATHA Date : 07.11.2025 RPD. 4 (VS,J C.R.P.No.3193 of 2024) 158 THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE V.SUJATHA (DISMISSED AS INFRUCTUOUS) CIVIL REVISION PETITION NO: 3193/2024 Date: 07.11.2025 RPD.