Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 42657 (AP)

GARIKAPATI CHOWDA KUMARI v. The State of Andhra Pradesh

WP/31146/2025 · 2025-11-10

Venkata Jyothirmai Pratapa

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

APHC010595792025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3396] TUESDAY,THE ELEVENTH DAY OF NOVEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA WRIT PETITION NO: 31146/2025 Between: 1. GARIKAPATI CHOWDA KUMARI, W/O.RAMANA RAO, AGED ABOUT 56 YEARS, OCC. HOUSE WIFE, R/O. PLOT NO. 201, AJANTHA APARTMENT, 3RD LANE, PRAKASH NAGAR, NARASARAOPET, PALNADU DISTRICT, ERSTWHILE GUNTUR DISTRICT. ...PETITIONER AND 1. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP. BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, DEPARTMENT OF HOME, SECRETARIAT BUILDINGS VELAGAPUDI, GUNTUR DISTRICT. 2. THE DIRECTOR GENERAL POLICE, MANGALAGIRI,GUNTUR DISTRICT. 3. THE SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, PALNADU DISTRICT, AT NARASARAOPET. ERSTWHILE GUNTUR DISTRICT. 4. THE STATION HOUSE OFFICER, NARASARAOPET I TOWN POLICE STATION, NARASARAOPET, PALNADU DISTRICT. ERSTWHILE GUNTUR DISTRICT. 5. MR CHARAN, S/O. KNOWN TO THE PETITIONER, AGED ABOUT 40 YEARS, OCC. CIRCLE INSPECTOR, PRESENTLY UNDER VACANCY RESERVED (VR), O/O I.G OFFICE, GUNTUR RANGE, GUNTUR, GUNTUR DISTRICT. 6. RAVILISETTY VENKATA PAWAN BHASKARA RAO, S/O R.V. RAMANA RAO, AGED ABOUT 41 YEARS, OCC. IT DEVELOPER, R/O DOOR NO. 4-12-534, STREET NO. 6, HIGH COURT COLONY, VANASTHALIPURAM, HYDERABAD, TELANGANA, PRESENTLY RESIDING AT R/O 9709, GEORGE BUSH, DR.MCKINNEY, DX 75072, USA ...RESPONDENT(S): Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. CHAKRAVARTHY P V S K Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. GP FOR HOME The Court made the following: ORDER: This Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of Constitution of India with the following prayer for: 2 “.... to issue a Writ, Order, or Direction, more particularly one in the nature of a Writ of Mandamus, declaring the action of the 2nd respondent in not considering the petitioners representation dt. 27-09-2025, in accordance with law, as illegal, arbitrary, unjust, and violative of the fundamental rights guaranteed to the petitioner under Articles 14 and 21 of the Constitution of India, and consequently direct the 2nd respondent to consider the said representation by passing a speaking order within a stipulated period and communicate the same to the petitioner in accordance with law, and pass.” 2. Heard Sri Sri chakravarthy P V S K, learned counsel for the petitioner and Sri Md.Farooq Learned Assistant Government Pleader for Home. 3. Learned Assistant Government Pleader for Home would submit that the investigation is completed and charge sheet is also filed. 4. Recording the said submissions, the Writ Petition is disposed of. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel thereto, miscellaneous petitions, if any, pending shall stand closed. ________________________________________ Dr.JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA Date:11.11.2025 RSD 3 97 HON’BLE DR. JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA W.P.No.31146 of 2025 Date:11.11.2025 RSD