Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 42652 (AP)

GURRALA ARUAKUMARI v. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH

WP/21334/2023 · 2025-12-03

Venkata Jyothirmai Pratapa

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

APHC010411512023 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) THURSDAY,THE FOURTH DAY OF DECEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA WRIT PETITION NO: 21334 OF 2023 Between: 1. GURRALA ARUAKUMARI, w/o Gurrala Srinivasarao, aged about 51 years, occ. Agriculture, r/o D.No. 2-130 , Brahmanapally Village, Rajupalem Mandal, Palnadu District. ...Petitioner AND 1. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, rep. by its Principal Secretary, Home Department, Secretariat, Velagapudi, Amaravati, Guntur District. 2. The Superintendent of Police, Narsaraopet, Palnadu District. 3. The Station House Officer, Rajupalem Police Station, Palnadu District. 4. The Tahsildar, Rajupalem Mandal, Palnadu District. 5. Gurrala Sudhakar Rao, S/o Late Suraiah, aged About 65 years, r/o Brahmanapally village, Rajupalem Mandal, Palnadu District. 6. Gurrala srinivasa rao, s/o (late) venkateswarllu, aged about 56years gujanagumdla, guntur town.guntur dristrit, 7. Gurrala Jagan mohan, s/o Sudhakar Rao, aged About 45 years, r/o Brahmanapally village, Rajupalem Mandal, Palnadu District. 8. Gurrala Maliikarjana Rao, s/o Sudhakar Rao aged About 35 years, r/o Brahmanapally village, Rajupalem Mandal, Palnadu District. ...Respondents Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased topleased to issue an appropriate Writ, Order or Direction, more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus, declaring the inaction of the respondent police in taking action against the 5th respondent and his associates pursuant to the complaint dt. 5-8-2023 and 7-8-2023 followed by personal visits, as being illegal, arbitrary, unjust and unconstitutional and consequently direct the respondent No.2 and 3 herein to take action against the 5th respondent and his associates in accordance with Law, and provide protection to the petitioner and his property, and to grant IA NO: 1 OF 2023 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased pleased to direct the respondent No.2 and 3 herein to forthwith register the FIR against the 5th respondent and his associates pursuant to the complaints dt. 5-8-2023 and 7-8-2023, pending disposal of the main Writ Petition, and to pass Counsel for the Petitioner: V BABY RANI Counsel for the Respondents: GP FOR HOME Counsel for the Respondents:GP FOR REVENUE THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA WRIT PETITION NO: 21334 OF 2023 The Court made the following order: This Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of Constitution of India with the following prayer for: “…to issue an appropriate Writ, Order or Direction, more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus, declaring the inaction of the respondent police in taking action against the 5th respondent and his associates pursuant to the complaint dt. 5-8-2023 and 7-8-2023 followed by personal visits, as being illegal, arbitrary, unjust and unconstitutional and consequently direct the respondent No.2 and 3 herein to take action against the 5th respondent and his associates in accordance with Law, and provide protection to the petitioner and his property, and to grant such other relief or reliefs…” 2. No representation for the petitioner. 3. The learned Assistant Government Pleader for Home, Sri V.Farooq, on instructions, submits that, based on the contents in the complaints dated made by the petitioner, it is found that the matter is civil in nature. He further submits that the police are not interfering in the civil disputes between the parties. 4. Recording the above submissions, the writ petition is disposed of. The petitioner is at liberty to work out her remedies before the appropriate forum in accordance with law. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel thereto, miscellaneous petitions pending, if any, shall stand closed. _________________________________________ Dr. JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA Date: 04.12.2025 Ksj