K.SENGOTTAYAN v. THE INSPECTOR GENERAL OF REGISTRATION
WP/11894/2025 · 2025-04-09
N Anand Venkatesh
Transfer Petitionbody2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 42649 (MAD) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 42649 (MAD) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
1/6 WP No. 11894 of 2025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED: 09-04-2025 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR JUSTICE N. ANAND VENKATESH WP No. 11894 of 2025
1. K.Sengottayan 2.C.Palanichamy 3.M.Saravanan 4.D.Nithyanandham Petitioner(s) Vs
1. The Inspector General Of Registration No.100, Santhome High Road, Raja Annamalaipuram, Santhome, Chennai-600 028 2.The District Registrar Coimbatore North District Registration, Coimbatore District. https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
2/6 WP No. 11894 of 2025 3.The Sub Registrar Thondamuthur Sub Registration Office, Coimbatore District Respondent(s) PRAYER Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India for issuance of a Writ of Mandamus, directing the 3rd respondent to consider the petitioners online application for Registration of sale deed vide Receipt No.TP/2129542298/2025 dated 13.03.2025 on the file of the 3rd respondent and permit the petitioners to register the sale deed within a stipulated time prescribed by this Court. For Petitioner(s): Mr.R.Balaguru Swamy For Respondent(s): Mr.P.Harish Government Advocate ORDER This writ petition has been filed for issue of writ of mandamus directing the 3 rd respondent to register the Sale Deed and to release the document. 2.Heard Mr.R.Balaguru Swamy, learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioners and Mr.P.Harish, learned Government Advocate appearing on behalf of respondents 1 to 3. https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
3/6 WP No. 11894 of 2025 3.The learned Government Advocate appearing on behalf of the respondents submitted that even though the online application was made and token was generated, the physical document was never presented before the 3 rd respondent and therefore, the 3 rd respondent did not have an occasion to deal with the document and the objections that have been given by the rival claimants. The learned Government Advocate submitted that as and when the document is presented, the 3 rd respondent will take a decision by either registering the document, if it is otherwise in order or refuse to register the document by issuing a refusal Check Slip. 4.In the light of the above submission, there shall be a direction to the petitioner to submit the document for registration before the 3 rd respondent. The 3 rd respondent on receipt of the same shall deal with the objections given by the rival parties and take a decision, within a period of one week. https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
4/6 WP No. 11894 of 2025 5.This writ petition is disposed of with the above directions. No Costs.
09-04-2025 (2/2) Index:Yes/No Speaking/Non-speaking order Internet:Yes Neutral Citation:Yes/No ssr https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
5/6 WP No. 11894 of 2025 To 1.The Inspector General Of Registration No.100, Santhome High Road, Raja Annamalaipuram, Santhome, Chennai- 600 028 2.The District Registrar Coimbatore North District Registration, Coimbatore District. 3.The Sub Registrar Thondamuthur Sub Registration Office, Coimbatore District https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
6/6 WP No. 11894 of 2025 N.ANAND VENKATESH J. ssr WP No. 11894 of 2025
09-04-2025 (2/2) https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis