Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Rajasthan · body

2025 DAILYLAW 42648 (RAJ)

JAGDISH SINGH S/O GORDHAN v. SHRI BHANSINGH S/O SHRI SHIVSINGH

CW/17086/2025 · 2025-12-08

Bipin Gupta

Transfer Petitionbody2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

[2025:RJ-JP:49833] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 17086/2025 1. Jagdish Singh S/o Gordhan, Aged About 65 Years, Resident Of C/o House Of Shri Guru Charan Singh, Near Old Petrol Pump, Kumher Road, Nadbai, District Bharatpur (Raj.) 2. Prahlad Singh S/o Mordwaj, Aged About 68 Years, Resident Of Opposite Old Petrol Pump, Kumher Road, Nadbai, District Bharatpur (Raj.) 3. Balraj S/o Raghuveer, Aged About 51 Years, Resident Of Opposite Old Petrol Pump, Kumher Road, Nadbai, District Bharatpur (Raj.) 4. Smt. Sheela W/o Shri Mahendra Singh, Aged About 63 Years, Resident Of Opposite Old Petrol Pump, Kumher Road, Nadbai, District Bharatpur (Raj.) ----Petitioners-Defendants No.1 to 4 Versus 1. Shri Bhansingh S/o Shri Shivsingh, Aged About 70 Years, Resident Of Village Sonkh, Tehsil Kathumar, District Alwar. 2. Jagveer Singh S/o Girraj Singh, Aged About 63 Years, Resident Of Opposite Old Petrol Pump, Kumher Road, Nadbai, District Bharatpur (Raj.) ----Respondents-Plaintiffs For Petitioner(s) : Mr. R.K. Daga with Mr. Rahul Singh Chouhan For Respondent(s) : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE BIPIN GUPTA Judgment / Order 08/12/2025 1. Without joining the issue on merits, learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the Court while granting permission to lead secondary evidence, has not only permitted to lead secondary evidence but also proceeded to read the document for a collateral [2025:RJ-JP:49833] (2 of 2) [CW-17086/2025] purpose, although the proceedings have not yet reached that stage. 2. Learned counsel further submits that he would be satisfied if the document is read in secondary evidence, but leaving it open to the Court to decide the extent to which the document may be read, whether for a collateral purpose or any other purpose. 3. Considering the same, the present writ petition is disposed of as withdrawn with the observation that the documents which have been permitted by the learned trial Court to be read through secondary evidence shall be subject to assessment at the stage of final hearing. 4. With the above observations, this writ petition is disposed of. 5. All pending application(s), if any, stands disposed of. (BIPIN GUPTA),J Sudha/04