282 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA SURESH KUMAR JHAMB STATE OF HARYANA AND ANOTHER CORAM: HON’BLE MR. Present: Mr. Mr. Pawan Kumar Kapila, Advocate Mr. Ramesh Kumar Ambavta, AAG, Haryana. Mr. Sushil K. Verma, HARPREET SINGH BRAR 1. This petition has been filed under Section 528 BNSS, 2023 seeking quashing of FIR No.369 dated 04.11.2020 under Sections 406/420/506/34 of IPC registered at Police Station Sirsa (Annexure P-1) along with all subsequent proceedings arising therefrom on the basis of compromise dated 29.03.2025 (Annexure P 2. The following order was passed on 07.04.2025 : IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH SURESH KUMAR JHAMB V/S HARYANA AND ANOTHER HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE HARPREET SINGH BRAR Mr. Harjit Singh, Advocate for Mr. Pawan Kumar Kapila, Advocate Mr. Ramesh Kumar Ambavta, AAG, Haryana. Mr. Sushil K. Verma, Advocate for respondent No.2. **** HARPREET SINGH BRAR, J. (ORAL) This petition has been filed under Section 528 BNSS, 2023 seeking quashing of FIR No.369 dated 04.11.2020 under Sections 406/420/506/34 of IPC registered at Police Station Sirsa 1) along with all subsequent proceedings arising therefrom on the basis of compromise dated 29.03.2025 (Annexure P The following order was passed on 07.04.2025 : “This petition has been filed under Section 528 BN 2023 seeking quashing of FIR No.369 dated 04.11.2020 under Sections 406/420/506/34 of IPC registered at Police Station Sirsa Sadar, District Sirsa (Annexure P proceedings arising therefrom on the basis of compromise dated 29.03.2025 (Annexure P-2). Notice of motion. At this stage, on the asking of the Court, Sharma, DAG, Haryana accepts notice on behalf of respondent No.1-State and Mr. Sushil Kumar Verma, Advocate accepts notice for respondent No.2 and files h undertakes to file his power of attorney on or before the next date of hearing. He admits to the factum of compromise. Copy of the paper book be supplied to them during the course of day. IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CRM-M-18503-2025 Date of decision: 07.05.2025 ...PETITIONER ...RESPONDENTS HARPREET SINGH BRAR Mr. Pawan Kumar Kapila, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Ramesh Kumar Ambavta, AAG, Haryana. Advocate for respondent No.2. This petition has been filed under Section 528 BNSS, 2023 seeking quashing of FIR No.369 dated 04.11.2020 under Sections 406/420/506/34 of IPC registered at Police Station Sirsa Sadar, District Sirsa 1) along with all subsequent proceedings arising therefrom on the basis of compromise dated 29.03.2025 (Annexure P-2). The following order was passed on 07.04.2025 :- This petition has been filed under Section 528 BNSS, 2023 seeking quashing of FIR No.369 dated 04.11.2020 under Sections 406/420/506/34 of IPC registered at Police Station Sirsa Sadar, District Sirsa (Annexure P-1) along with all subsequent proceedings arising therefrom on the basis of compromise dated At this stage, on the asking of the Court, Ms. Geeta Sharma, DAG, Haryana accepts notice on behalf of respondent State and Mr. Sushil Kumar Verma, Advocate accepts notice for respondent No.2 and files his memo of appearance and undertakes to file his power of attorney on or before the next date of hearing. He admits to the factum of compromise. Copy of the paper book be supplied to them during the course of day. MANISHA 2025.05.07 17:59 I attest to the accuracy and authenticiy of this order/judgment CRM-M-18503 3. In compliance of the aforesaid order, a report has been received from the concerned jurisdictional Court that the compromise between the parties is genuine and arrived at without any pressure or coercion from anyone. 4. In view of the compromise and the ratio of law laid down by the Hon’ble Supreme Court in and another, (2014) 6 SCC 46 Kaushalya (Mrs.) and others (1980) 1 SCC 63 Kulwinder Singh Vs. State of Punjab 2007 (3) RCR (Crl.) 1052 is allowed and FIR No.369 dated 04.11.2020 under Sections 406/420/506/34 of IPC registered at Police Station Sirsa Sadar, District Sirsa (Annexure P and all consequential proceedings arising out of the same are quashed, qua the petitioner. May 07, 2025 manisha (i) (ii) 18503-2025 2 Service is complete. Adjourned to 07.05.2025. In the meanwhile, the parties are directed to appear before the learned trial Court/Illaqa Magistrate within two weeks from today or any other date convenient to the trial Court/Illaqa Magistrate, to get recorded their statements regarding compromise and after recording their statements, learned trial Court/Illaqa Magistrate is directed to send report regarding the genuineness of compromise and also to intimate whether any PO proceedings are pending against any of the party on or before the date fixed. A copy of the order be sent to learned trial Court/Illaqa Magistrate through fax for compliance. In compliance of the aforesaid order, a report has been received from the concerned jurisdictional Court that the compromise between the s genuine and arrived at without any pressure or coercion from In view of the compromise and the ratio of law laid down by the Hon’ble Supreme Court in Narinder Singh and others vs. State of Punjab and another, (2014) 6 SCC 46, and Shakuntala Kaushalya (Mrs.) and others (1980) 1 SCC 63 and Full Bench of this Court in Kulwinder Singh Vs. State of Punjab 2007 (3) RCR (Crl.) 1052 FIR No.369 dated 04.11.2020 under Sections 406/420/506/34 ered at Police Station Sirsa Sadar, District Sirsa (Annexure P and all consequential proceedings arising out of the same are quashed, qua the (HARPREET SINGH BRAR Whether speaking/reasoned Whether reportable 05.2025. In the meanwhile, the parties are directed to appear before the learned trial Court/Illaqa Magistrate within two weeks from today or any other date convenient to the trial Court/Illaqa Magistrate, to get recorded their statements regarding mise and after recording their statements, learned trial Court/Illaqa Magistrate is directed to send report regarding the genuineness of compromise and also to intimate whether any PO proceedings are pending against any of the party on or before the A copy of the order be sent to learned trial Court/Illaqa Magistrate through fax for compliance.” In compliance of the aforesaid order, a report has been received from the concerned jurisdictional Court that the compromise between the s genuine and arrived at without any pressure or coercion from In view of the compromise and the ratio of law laid down by the Narinder Singh and others vs. State of Punjab Shakuntala Sawhney (Mrs) Vs. and Full Bench of this Court in Kulwinder Singh Vs. State of Punjab 2007 (3) RCR (Crl.) 1052, this petition FIR No.369 dated 04.11.2020 under Sections 406/420/506/34 ered at Police Station Sirsa Sadar, District Sirsa (Annexure P-1) and all consequential proceedings arising out of the same are quashed, qua the HARPREET SINGH BRAR) JUDGE Yes/No Yes/No MANISHA 2025.05.07 17:59 I attest to the accuracy and authenticiy of this order/judgment