IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA 106 Devender Sh. Vinay Kumar, IRPS, Commission CORAM: Present:- NIDHI GUPTA J. (Oral) proceedings against the respondent for not complying the order dated 13.8.2024 Court in CWP of Haryana and another direction within four weeks, the same be decided in four months, which this Court has no reason to believe the authorities would not ad just, fair and reasonable manner. Upon doing so, after notice and hearing offered to them and if found entitled, grant the benefit forthwith. Needless to say, if the orders are adverse to their interest, COCP-1804-2025 (O & M) IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH COCP No.1804 of 2025 Date of decision : Devender Versus Sh. Vinay Kumar, IRPS, Secretary, Haryana Staff Selection Commission CORAM:- HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE NIDHI GUPTA Mr. Kushagra Beniwal, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Dushyant Saharan, AAG, Haryana. NIDHI GUPTA J. (Oral) Prayer in this petition is for initiation of contempt proceedings against the respondent for not complying the order dated 13.8.2024 (Annexure P-1) passed by a co Court in CWP-3288-2022 titled as “Naveep Singh and others vs. State Haryana and another” whereby the petition was disposed of with a direction “…that in case the petitioners submit a representation within four weeks, the same be decided in four months, which this Court has no reason to believe the authorities would not ad just, fair and reasonable manner. Upon doing so, after notice and hearing offered to them and if found entitled, grant the benefit forthwith. Needless to say, if the orders are adverse to their interest, 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH 1804 of 2025 (O & M) Date of decision :-09.07.2025 …..Petitioner Secretary, Haryana Staff Selection …..Respondent HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE NIDHI GUPTA Kushagra Beniwal, Advocate Mr. Dushyant Saharan, AAG, Haryana. Prayer in this petition is for initiation of contempt proceedings against the respondent for not complying the order dated 1) passed by a co-ordinate Bench of this Naveep Singh and others vs. State ” whereby the petition was disposed of with a “…that in case the petitioners submit a representation within four weeks, the same be decided in four months, which this Court has no reason to believe the authorities would not address in a just, fair and reasonable manner. Upon doing so, after notice and hearing offered to them and if found entitled, grant the benefit forthwith. Needless to say, if the orders are adverse to their interest, VIJAY ASIJA 2025.07.10 11.54 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document the same shall contain reasons and the seek legal redress thereupon.” dated 08.7.2025 passed by the competent authority, the claim of the petitioner has been rejected. that necessary compliance has been made, while passing a speaking order dated 08.7.2025 by the competent authority; thus, no cause survives in the present petition. the learned counsel for the respondent thereof is supplied to learned counsel for the petitioner. Registry to tag/paginate the same at appropriate place in the paper does not press the present petition any further. the aforesaid Speaking Order dated 08.7.2025 as per law, if so advised. July 09, 202 Vijay Asija Whether speaking/reasoned Yes / No Whether Reportable Yes / No COCP-1804-2025 (O & M) the same shall contain reasons and the seek legal redress thereupon.” Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that vide order dated 08.7.2025 passed by the competent authority, the claim of the petitioner has been rejected. Learned counsel for the respondent that necessary compliance has been made, while passing a speaking order dated 08.7.2025 by the competent authority; thus, no cause survives in the present petition. Copy of the aforesaid order dated 08.7.2025 produced by learned counsel for the respondent-State is taken on record. Copy thereof is supplied to learned counsel for the petitioner. Registry to tag/paginate the same at appropriate place in the paper In view of the above, learned counsel for the petition does not press the present petition any further. Dismissed as not pressed. However, the petitioner would be at liberty to challenge the aforesaid Speaking Order dated 08.7.2025 as per law, if so Rule stands discharged. Pending application(s), if any, shall stands disposed of. , 2025 Whether speaking/reasoned Yes / No Whether Reportable Yes / No 2 the same shall contain reasons and the petitioners shall be free to Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that vide order dated 08.7.2025 passed by the competent authority, the claim of the respondent-State also submits that necessary compliance has been made, while passing a speaking order dated 08.7.2025 by the competent authority; thus, no cause Copy of the aforesaid order dated 08.7.2025 produced by State is taken on record. Copy thereof is supplied to learned counsel for the petitioner. Registry to tag/paginate the same at appropriate place in the paper-book. In view of the above, learned counsel for the petitioner does not press the present petition any further. However, the petitioner would be at liberty to challenge the aforesaid Speaking Order dated 08.7.2025 as per law, if so application(s), if any, shall stands disposed of. ( NIDHI GUPTA ) JUDGE VIJAY ASIJA 2025.07.10 11.54 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document