APHC010184502015 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3330] MONDAY,THE EIGHTH DAY OF DECEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE TARLADA RAJASEKHAR RAO WRIT PETITION NO: 31576/2015 Between: 1. SMT. GONELA RAMA DEVI,, W/O. VEERA VENKATA SATYANARAYANA, AGED 40 YEARS, OCC. HOUSE WIFE, R/O. DOOR NO. 54-37-17/1, NIDADAVOLU TOWN AND MANDAL WEST GODAVARI DISTRICT ...PETITIONER AND 1. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH REP BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, PROHIBITION & EXCISE DEPARTMENT, A.P. SECRETARIAT, HYDERABAD 2. THE COMMISSIONER OF PROHIBITION EXCISE, STATE OF A.P., HYDERABAD 3. THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF PROHIBITION EXCISE, ELURU, WEST GODAVARI DISTRICT 4. THE SUPERINTENDENT OF PROHIBITION EXCISE, NODADAVOLU TOWN, WEST GODAVARI DISTRICT ...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased toto issue a Writ, Order or Direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus, declaring the illegal action of the respondent no.4 in violating the agreement dated 03.07.2015 which has been valid up to 30.06.2017 by trying to vacate the petitioner shop bearing No.10-2/3-1A situated at Nidadavolu Town, West Godavari District without following due process of law is illegal, arbitrary and against the principles of natural and consequently direct the respondents not to vacate the shop/ premises of the petitioner bearing No. 10-2/3-1A situated at Nidadavolu Town, West Godavari District until the subsisting remaining lease period completed IA NO: 1 OF 2015(WPMP 40834 OF 2015 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the respondents not to remove / vacate the retail outlet run by the respondents in the petitioner premises bearing No. 10-2/3-1A situated at Nidadavolu Town, West Godavari District, pending the agreement dated 03.07.2015, pending disposal of the above writ petition 2 Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. MANCHANAPALLI SURYANARAYANA Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. GP FOR PROHIBITION & EXCISE (AP) The Court made the following: 3 THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE TARLADA RAJASEKHAR RAO WRIT PETITION No.31576 of 2015 ORDER: Sri Eswar Sai Teja, learned counsel, requested two weeks time. This Court already accommodated the learned counsel for petitioner three times i.e., on 10.11.2025, 24.11.2025 and 01.12.2025. Now, his request is rejected. 2. The short grievance of the petitioner in the writ petition is that respondent authorities are trying to vacate the petitioner from shop No.10-2/3-1A, situated at Nidadavolu Town, West Godavari District, without following due procedure of law. 3. On perusal of the writ affidavit, it appears that lease was granted for the period from 01.07.2015 to 30.06.2017. Lease period was expired long back. Therefore, nothing survives in the writ petition to adjudicate further. 4. In view of the same, the present Writ Petition is dismissed as infructuous. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel thereto, miscellaneous petitions pending, if any shall stand closed. __________________________________ JUSTICE TARLADA RAJASEKHAR RAO Date: 08.12.2025 KBN 4 181 THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE TARLADA RAJASEKHAR RAO WRIT PETITION No.31576 of 2015 Date: 08.12.2025 KBN