HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD WRIT - C No. - 29148 of 2011 Court No. - 29 (Sl.No.193) HON'BLE MAHESH CHANDRA TRIPATHI, J. HON'BLE ANISH KUMAR GUPTA, J. 1. Heard Sri Rajeev Ratan Shukla, learned counsel for the petitioner, Sri Fuzail Ahmad Ansari, learned Standing Counsel for the State-respondent and Sri Vineet Pandey, learned counsel, who appears for Greater Noida Authority. 2. The present writ petitioner has been preferred for a direction commanding the respondents to pay the compensation of the land acquired of the petitioner at the present market rate within stipulated period. 3. At the outset, learned counsel for the petitioners has placed reliance upon the order dated 20.08.2025 passed by the Division Bench of this Court in Writ-C No. 30065 of 2011 (Smt. Shakuntala vs. State of U.P. and others). He submits that the instant matter is squarely covered the judgment and order passed by the Division Bench, which has been disposed of in the light of judgment passed by the Full Bench of this Court in Gajraj Singh and others vs. State of U.P. and others, (2011) 11 ADJ 1 (FB) wherein the acquisition has been approved, considering that the land was acquired for planned development. and as such it is submitted that the instant matter may also be disposed of in terms of Gajraj Singh (supra). 4. Learned counsel for the respondent Greater Noida Authority, does not dispute the factual and legal aspect of the matter. Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : H.N. Shukla, R.R. Shukla Counsel for Respondent(s) : Ramendra Pratap Singh Smt. Dharamwati .....Petitioner(s) State of U.P. and Others .....Respondent(s) 5. Accordingly, the instant writ petition stands disposed of in terms of Smt. Shakuntala vs. State of U.P. (supra). September 16, 2025 Ashish Pd. WRIC No. 29148 of 2011 2 (Anish Kumar Gupta,J.) (Mahesh Chandra Tripathi,J.) Digitally signed by :- ASHISH PRASAD High Court of Judicature at Allahabad Digitally signed by :- ASHISH PRASAD High Court of Judicature at Allahabad