1 2025:CGHC:47398 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WPC No. 4756 of 2025 1 - Thakur Ram Sahu S/o Shri Chandrahas Sahu Aged About 38 Years R/o Nayakbandha, Ward No. 06, Post Abhanpur, District Raipur Chhattisgarh ... Petitioner(s) versus 1 - Chhattisgarh State Woman Commission, Besides Chief Election Commission, Shastri Chowk, Raipur, District Raipur Chhattisgarh Through Its President 2 - Dr. Yogita Sahu D/o Late Dhanaram Sahu R/o Village And Post - Pond, Abhanpur, District Raipur Chhattisgarh ----Respondents (Cause-title taken from Case Information System) For Petitioner : Mr. Umesh Pandey, on behalf of Mr. Pushpendra Kumar Patel, Advocate For Respondent : None. Hon’ble Shri Arvind Kumar Verma, Judge Order on Board 16/09/2025 1. Counsel for the Petitioner prays for the following relief(s):- (i)That, the Hon’ble Court may be kindly be call for the entire record in relates to the case of the petitioner. (ii) That this Hon’ble Court may kindly be pleased to issue writ/ writs order/ orders, direction/directions, thereby quashed / set aside the impugned order dated 09.12.2024 (Annexure P-1) passed by the Respondent No. 1(with regard to imposition of marital bondage of two years), in the interest of justice.n expedited manner. (iii) Any other relief which may be suitable in the facts and circumstances of the case, may also be granted. Digitally signed by JYOTI JHA Date: 2025.09.18 12:02:32 +0530 2 2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits the Respondent No.02 had filed an application dated 20.08.2024 before the Respondent No.01 against the Petitioner, alleging therein that Petitioner had continuously developing physical relation with her since 12 years on the pretext of marriage and ultimately denied to perform the marriage. The application of the petitioner was accepted by the Respondent No.01 and proceeded further vide order dated 18.09.2024. The Respondent No.01 vide its order dated 20.11.2024, the Respondent No.02 was directed to file First Information Report against the Petitioner. It was further directed the Respondent No.02 to take action for termination of service of Petitioner on account of physical pain, mental agony etc. On which, the Petitioner has submitted that he will make payment of Rs. 20,00,000/- to the Respondent No.02 in lieu of full and final settlement within a period of two months. The Respondent No.01 has fixed the case for 09.12.2024 for payment by the Petitioner. The father of the Petitioner and the brother of the Respondent No.02 appeared before the Respondent No.01 and had submitted an agreement along with cash of Rs. 10,00,000/- and a Post Dated Cheque of Rs. 10,00,000/-, which were accepted by the Respondent No.02. Thereafter, the Respondent No.01 has passed an order for marital bondage of 02 years and the parties will comply with the same. The Petitioner after passing the impugned order 09.12.2024, the Petitioner has filed an application before the Respondent No.01 13.12.2024, requesting for "Completely free from marital bondage of 02 years". Thereafter, waiting for a period of about 03 months, the Petitioner had again moved an application 3 dated 19.03.2025 before the Respondent No.01. Both the applications are still pending with the Respondent No.01. Hence this petition. 3. I have heard learned counsel for the parties and perused the material available on record. 4. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, instead of keeping the present writ petition pending, I find it appropriate to dismiss the petition of the petitioner as no ground is made out by the petitioner which warrants interference because the dispute is between petitioner and private party, as such the present writ petition is not maintainable. Accordingly the writ petition is dismissed. Sd/- (Arvind Kumar Verma) Judge Jyoti