SANJAY JAKHAD SON OF SHRI RAMCHANDRA JAKHAD v. STATE OF RAJASTHAN
CRLMP/389/2025 · 2025-07-16
Praveer Bhatnagar
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 4263 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 4263 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
[2025:RJ-JP:26585] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous (Petition) No. 389/2025 Sanjay Jakhad Son Of Shri Ramchandra Jakhad, Aged About 39 Years, Resident Of 42A, Arpit Nagar, Vaishali Nagar, Police Station Chitrakoot, Jaipur. ----Petitioner Versus
1. State Of Rajasthan, Through P.p.
2. Ashok Kumar Meena Son Of Shri Berisal Meena, Resident Of Jaisinghpura Bas, Bhankrota, Jaipur West (Raj). ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Ravindra Singh Shekhawat, Adv. For Respondent(s) For Complainant : : Mr. Manvendra Singh, PP Mr. Vijay Singh, Adv.
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRAVEER BHATNAGAR
Order 16/07/2025
1. The present petition has been filed under Section 528 of BNSS for quashing the entire criminal proceedings arising out of FIR No.90/2024, registered at Police Station Sadar Jaipur, District Jaipur (West) for the offences under Sections 420, 467, 468, 471 and 120-B of IPC and Sections 3(1)(f), 3(1)(g) and 3(1)(r) of SC/ST (Prevention of Atrocities) Act on the basis of compromise arrived at between the parties.
2. The Court vide order dated 22.01.2025 directed the Investigating Officer to verify the factum of compromise arrived at between the parties. The said fact has been verified by the Investigating Officer, therefore, on the basis of compromise arrived at between the parties, the FIR and subsequent proceedings if any taken against the petitioner may be quashed.
[2025:RJ-JP:26585] (2 of 2) [CRLMP-389/2025]
3.
Learned counsel Mr. Vijay Singh appears on behalf of the complainant concedes that the compromise has been arrived at between the parties and if the FIR against the petitioner is quashed then the complainant have no objection.
4. Learned Public Prosecutor has submitted the factual report, the same is taken on record.
5. The factual report shows that the parties have arrived at compromise and the said compromise has already been verified by the Investigating Officer.
6. The factual report shows that the parties have arrived at compromise and the said compromise has already been verified by the Investigating Officer. Therefore, considering the dictum laid down by the Hon’ble Apex Court in the case of Gian Singh vs State of Punjab & Anr., 2012 (10) SCC 303 and Ramawatar vs State of Madhya Pradesh, 2021 SCC OnLine SC 966 and the nature of offence committed by the petitioner also looking to the fact that the parties have arrived at compromise and the written compromise have been duly verified by the Investigating Officer, this Court deems it just and proper to allow the present petition and the FIR No.90/2024, registered at Police Station Sadar Jaipur, District Jaipur (West), with all consequential proceedings against the petitioner is hereby quashed and set aside.
7. Accordingly, the instant petition is allowed. Pending application(s), if any, stand disposed of.
(PRAVEER BHATNAGAR),J Ashwani Kr Srivastava /-229