M/s. VDN Filling Station, v. The Deputy Commercial Tax Officer-I,
WP/1706/2025 · 2025-02-05
Harinath N, R Raghunandan Rao
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 4263 (AP) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 4263 (AP) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
1 RRR,J & HN,J W.P.No.1706/2025
APHC010030142025
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3488] WEDNESDAY, THE FIFTH DAY OF FEBRUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE R RAGHUNANDAN RAO THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE HARINATH.N WRIT PETITION NO: 1706/2025 Between: M/s. Vdn Filling Station, ...PETITIONER AND The Deputy Commercial Tax Officeri and Others ...RESPONDENT(S) Counsel for the Petitioner:
1. G NARENDRA CHETTY Counsel for the Respondent(S):
1. GP FOR COMMERCIAL TAX The Court made the following Order: (per Hon’ble Sri Justice R. Raghunandan Rao)
Heard Sri G. Narendra Chetty, learned counsel appearing for the petitioner, and learned Government pleader for Commercial Tax, appearing for respondents 1 and 2.
2. The petitioner has challenged the penalty proceedings, arising out of the order of assessment, dated 17.08.2024, under the AP VAT Act,
2 RRR,J & HN,J W.P.No.1706/2025
2005 (for short ‘the Act’). The petitioner had challenged the order of assessment, by way of W.P.No.100 of 2025, and the penalty order by way of W.P.No.1706/2025.
3. This Court, by order dated 08.01.2025, had set aside the assessment order, challenged in W.P.No.100 of 2025 and the assessments were remanded back to the territorial Assessing Officers to pass appropriate orders. In such circumstances, the penalty order, dated 26.12.2024, which arises out of the assessment orders, which have now been set aside, would not survive.
4. Accordingly, this writ petition is allowed setting aside the order of penalty, dated 26.12.2024. However, it would be open to the Assessing Officer to initiate penalty proceedings, subsequent to the assessment orders, for the relevant period, being passed by the Assessing Officer, if it is found that the conditions for initiating the penalty proceedings are available, after giving opportunity to the petitioner. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel, pending miscellaneous applications, if any, shall stand closed. ________________________ R. RAGHUNANDAN RAO, J
___________________ HARINATH.N, J Js.
3 RRR,J & HN,J W.P.No.1706/2025
HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE R. RAGHUNANDAN RAO & HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE HARINATH. N
W.P.No.1706 of 2025 (per Hon’ble Sri Justice R. Raghunandan Rao)
5th February, 2025
Js