Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 42628 (AP)

PALAVALI MALIKA v. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH

WP/6727/2019 · 2025-11-19

B V L N Chakravarthi

Original Suitbody2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

APHC010154472019 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3368] THURSDAY, THE TWENTIETH DAY OF NOVEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE B V L N CHAKRAVARTHI WRIT PETITION NO: 6727/2019 Between: 1. PALAVALI MALIKA, W/O.VISHWANATH AGED 44 YEARS, OCC HOUSEWIFE, R/O.D.NO.14-273, CAPTAIN LAKSHMI STREET, MADANAPALLE TOWN, CHITTOOR DISTRICT. ...PETITIONER AND 1. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP. BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT, HOME DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT, VELAGAPUDI, GUNTUR DISTRICT. 2. SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, CHITTOOR DISTRICT AT CHITTOOR. 3. STATION HOUSE OFFICER, MADANAPALLE II TOWN POLICE STATION, MADANAPALLE TOWN, CHITTOOR DISTRICT. 4. R ARUNA KRISHNA, W/O.BALAKRISHNA, AGED ABOUT 50 YEARS, HOUSEWIFE, R/O. FLAT NO.116, SUNDARAM BLOCK, OPP ICFAI, RAMRAJNAGAR, JEEDIMETLA, SECUNDERABAD. ...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue a writ, order or direction more particularly one in the nature of WRIT OF MANDAMUS declaring the action of the 3rd respondent in calling the petitioner and her family members to the II Town Police Station, Madanapalle at the instance of 2 the 4th respondent, as illegal, arbitrary and against to law and consequently direct the 3rd respondent not to call for the petitioner and her family members to appear before the 3rd respondent i.e., II Town Police Station, Madanapalle, Chittoor District at the instance of the 4th respondent concerning to the property the petitioner and 4th respondent during the pendency of O.S.No.406 of 2018 on the file of I Additional Junior Civil Judge at Madanapalle, Chittoor District and pass IA NO: 1 OF 2019 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the 3rd respondent not to call the petitioner and her family members to the II Town Police Station, Madanapalle, Chittoor District despite pending of Civil Suit in 0.S.No. 406 of 2018 on the file of I Additional Junior Civil Judge at Madanapalle, Chittoor District, pending disposal of the writ petition and pass Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. BHASKAR GANDHAM Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. BHASKAR GANDHAM Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. GP FOR HOME (AP) The Court made the following: 3 THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE B.V.L.N.CHAKRAVARTHI WRIT PETITION No.6727 OF 2019 ORDER: None appeared for the petitioner either physically or through video conference, though the matter is posted under the caption ‘for dismissal’. Earlier also, there was no representation for the petitioner. 2. Sri R.Mallikarjuna Rao, learned Assistant Government Pleader for Home already submitted that criminal case is pending against the writ petitioner vide Crime No.53 of 2019 of II Town Police Station, Madanapalle, for the offence under Sections 465, 466, 468, 471, 474 and 506 of I.P.C. and police issued notice under Section 41-A Cr.P.C. to the writ petitioner for the purpose of investigation of the crime. 3. Considering the above facts and circumstances, the writ petition is dismissed for non-prosecution. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel thereto, interlocutory applications, if any, pending in this Writ Petition shall stand closed. ______________________________ JUSTICE B.V.L.N. CHAKRAVARTHI 20.11.2025 Pmk 4 19 THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE B.V.L.N. CHAKRAVARTHI WRIT PETITION No:6727 OF 2019 Date: 20.11.2025 Pmk