1 APHC010665722022 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3396] FRIDAY, THE FOURTEENTH DAY OF NOVEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA WRIT PETITION NO: 39630/2022 Between: 1. MOLAKA SUNDARAIAH, S/O MOLAKA JAMES, AGED ABOUT 78 YEARS, OCC. AGRICULTURIST, R/O BOYAREVULA VILLAGE, VELUGODU MANDAL, NANDYAL DISTRICT. 2. MOLAKA YESANNA, S/O MOLAKA JAMES, AGED ABOUT 75 YEARS, OCC. AGRICULTURIST, R/O BOYAREVULA VILLAGE, VELUGODU MANDAL, NANDYAL DISTRICT. 3. MOLAKA RATNAMAIAH, S/O MOLAKA JAMES, AGED ABOUT 72 YEARS, OCC. AGRICULTURIST, R/O BOYAREVULA VILLAGE, VELUGODU MANDAL, NANDYAL DISTRICT. ...PETITIONER(S) AND 1. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP. BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, HOME DEPARTMENT, AP SECRETARIAT, VELAGAPUDI, GUNTUR DISTRICT. 2. THE SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, NANDYAL, NANDYAL DISTRICT. 3. THE DEPUTY SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, ATMAKUR, NANDYAL DISTRICT. 4. THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, ATMAKUR, NANDYAL DISTRICT. 5. THE SUBINSPECTOR OF POLICE, VELUGODU POLICE STATION, VELUGODU, NANDYAL DISTRICT. 6. BONALA PEDDA OBULAIAH, S/O LATE RATNAMAIAH, AGED ABOUT 42 YEARS, OCC. AGRICULTURIST, R/O BOYAREVULA VILLAGE, VELUGODU MANDAL, NANDYAL DISTRICT. 7. BONALA CHINNA OBULALIAH, S/O LATE RATNAMAIAH, AGED ABOUT 39 YEARS, OCC. AGRICULTURIST, R/O BOYAREVULA VILLAGE, VELUGODU MANDAL, NANDYAL DISTRICT. 8. BONALA LAKSHMI NARAYANA, S/O LATE RATNAMAIAH, AGED ABOUT 36 YEARS, OCC. AGRICULTURIST, R/O BOYAREVULA VILLAGE, VELUGODU MANDAL, NANDYAL DISTRICT 9. BONALA JAMBULAIAH, S/O LATE RATNAMAIAH, AGED ABOUT 33 YEARS, OCC. AGRICULTURIST, RIO BOYAREVULA VILLAGE, VELUGODU MANDAL, NANDYAL DISTRICT. ...RESPONDENT(S): 2 Counsel for the Petitioner(S): 1. C PRAKASH REDDY Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. GP FOR HOME 2. V NITESH The Court made the following: ORDER: This Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of Constitution of India with the following prayer for: “.... to issue an order or direction or Writ more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus by declaring the inaction on the part of official respondents in not providing protection from respondents 6 to 9 in harvesting paddy crop raised in Sy.No.1816E situated in Velugodu village limits, Velugodu Mandal, Nandyal District, as arbitrary, illegal and violative of Article 21 of the Constitution of India and consequently direct the official respondents to provide protection from respondents 6 to 9 to harvest the paddy crop raised in Sy.No.1816E situated in Velugodu village limits, Velugodu Mandal, Nandyal District.” 2. Today, when the matter came up for hearing, learned counsel for the petitioners would submit that nothing survives for adjudication in the Writ Petition and the matter has become infructuous. 3. Recording the said submission, the Writ Petition is dismissed as infructuous. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel thereto, miscellaneous petitions, if any, pending shall stand closed. __________________________________ Dr.VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA, J Date: 14.11.2025 ASR 3 THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA W.P.No.39630 of 2022 Dt..14.11.2025 ASR