Research › Search › Judgment

Calcutta High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 42621 (CAL)

SANARUL SK @ SONARUL SK v. STATE OF WEST BENGAL

CRM(M)/1806/2025 · 2025-10-03

Partha Sarathi Sen

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

03.10.2025 Serial no. 41 [Dd] (Bail allowed) CRM(M)/1806/2025 In re: An Application for Bail under Section 439 of the Code of Criminal Procedure corresponding to Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 in connection with G.R. No. 3905 of 2024 arising out of Bhagwangola Police Station Case No. 421 of 2024 dated 16.08.2024 under Sections 329(4)/103(1)/61/3(5) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 and Sections 25(1A)/27(3) of the Arms Act. -And- In the matter of : Sanarul Sk alias Sonarul Sk … … Petitioner Mr. Kushal Kumar MUkherjee, Mr. Narattam Acharyya, Advocates … … For the Petitioner Mr. Joydeep Roy, Ms. Manasi Roy, Advocates … …For the State Mr. Tapodip Gupta, Advocate .. …For the de facto complainant 1. Heard learned advocates for the petitioner, State and the de facto complainant at length. 2. Perused the entire materials as placed before this Court including the materials as available in the case diary. 3. On careful perusal of the entire materials placed before this Court, it reveals that on the alleged day and hour of the alleged crime, the present accused petitioner was very much present along with the other accused persons. It further reveals from the case diary that it is the consistent statement of the witnesses that one Golam Sk is the principal assailant who shot a bullet on the head of the deceased. 2 4. Considering the fact that the present accused petitioner is not the principal assailant and also considering the fact that the present accused petitioner is languishing in JC since 21.08.2024, this Court is inclined to allow prayer for bail. 5. It is, thus, ordered that the present accused petitioner may find a bail of Rs.30,000/- with two registered sureties of Rs.15,000/- each, subject to satisfaction of learned ACJM, Jangipur on condition that the present accused petitioner shall appear before the learned trial court on each and every date of substantive hearing failing which learned trial Court will be at liberty to issue non-bailable warrant of arrest against the present accused petitioner for his immediate apprehension and shall not show any threat to the prosecution witnesses and/or shall not tamper with the evidence as collected by the prosecution. 6. The prayer for bail of the petitioner is allowed. 7. All parties shall act in terms of server copy of the order downloaded from the official website of this Court. (Partha Sarathi Sen, J.)