Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Rajasthan · body

2025 DAILYLAW 42619 (RAJ)

RAJENDRA YADAV S/O RAM KISHOR v. STATE OF RAJASTHAN

HC/426/2025 · 2025-12-08

Bhuwan Goyal, Mahendar Kumar Goyal

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

[2025:RJ-JP:49837-DB] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR D.B. Habeas Corpus Petition No. 426/2025 Rajendra Yadav S/o Ram Kishor, Aged About 23 Years, R/o Ward No. 10, Dhani Guman Ji, Tehsil Neem Ka Thana, Raipur, District Sikar. ----Petitioner Versus 1. State Of Rajasthan, Through The Secretary, Department Of Home, Govt. Of Rajasthan, Secretariat, Jaipur. 2. The Director General Of Police, Police Head Quarter, Lalkothi, Jaipur (Raj.). 3. The Additional Director General Of Police, Anti Human Trafficking Unit, Jaipur (Raj.). 4. The Commissioner Of Police, Police Commissionerate, Jaipur. 5. The Sho, Police Station Shipra Path, District Jaipur. 6. Sitaram Yadav S/o Unknown, R/o Ghasipura, Jaipur. 7. Kaluram S/o Unknown, R/o Shivpuri, Manoharpur, Jaipur. 8. Rohitash S/o Omprakash Yadav, R/o Ghasipura, Jaipur. 9. Mahendra Yadav, Sho, Police Station Shipra Path, Jaipur. 10. Ramjilal, Sub-Inspector, Police Station Shipra Path, Jaipur. ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Suresh Kumar with Ms. Pratibha Gupta Ms. Neema Kousal Mr. Chaman Singh For Respondent(s) : Mr. Rajesh Choudhary, GA cum AAG with Mr. Aman Agarwal Mr. Mahendra Yadav, SHO, Shipra Path, Jaipur HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MAHENDAR KUMAR GOYAL HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE BHUWAN GOYAL Order 08/12/2025 The instant habeas corpus petition has been preferred by the petitioner-husband alleging illegal detention of his wife – ‘P.Y’. [2025:RJ-JP:49837-DB] (2 of 2) [HC-426/2025] Today, the detenue 'P.Y.' is present in person before this court and is identified by Mr. Mahendra Yadav, SHO, Shipra Path, Jaipur. On interaction, she submits that she is major, is not in illegal detention and wants to reside with the petitioner-Mr. Rajendra Yadav-her husband. Indisputably, Ms. “P.Y.” is major and therefore, is at liberty to reside wherever she desires. In view thereof, this habeas corpus petition is disposed of in following terms:- 1. The police authorities are directed to ensure her safe return to the petitioner’s house. Pending application(s), if any, also stands disposed of. (BHUWAN GOYAL),J (MAHENDAR KUMAR GOYAL),J Anu /233