Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Karnataka · body

2025 DAILYLAW 42618 (KAR)

B M KEMPAIAH v. SMT. LAKSHMAMMA

CRP/505/2024 · 2025-12-11

V Srishananda

Original Suitbody2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:52781 CRP No. 505 of 2024 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 11TH DAY OF DECEMBER, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V SRISHANANDA CIVIL REVISION PETITION NO.505 OF 2024 (IO) BETWEEN: 1. B M KEMPAIAH S/O LATE PUTTASIDDAIAH AGED ABOUT 67 YEARS, 2. SMT. SUSHEELA R RATNA AGED ABOUT 58 YEARS, W/O B M KEMPAIAHA BOTH ARE R/AT NO.673 1st MAIN ROAD, 2nd CROSS, KAMALANAGARA BANGALORE -79 3. SRI. B M SIDDAPPA AGED ABOUT 65 YEARS, S/O LATE PUTTASIDDAIAH 4. SMT. SHASHIKALA AGED ABOUT 50 YEARS, W/O B M SIDDAPPA NO.3 AND 4 ARE R/AT NO.13A, 2ND MAIN ROAD, 2ND CROSS KANTEERAVA NAGARA, BENGALURU -96 5. SRI. B M PARAMESHWARAPPA AGED ABOUT 64 YEARS, S/O LATE PUTTASIDDAPPA R/AT BYLADAKERE VILLAGE, Digitally signed by R MANJUNATHA Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:52781 CRP No. 505 of 2024 YEDIYURU HOBLI, KUNIGAL TALUK -572 142 …PETITIONERS (BY SRI MOHANA CHANDRA P, ADVOCATE) AND: SMT. LAKSHMAMMA AGED ABOUT 55 YEARS, D/O RANGAIAH W/O HANUMANTHAIAH R/AT HEGGADATHIHALL VILLAGE, KASABA HOBLI, KUNIGAL TALUK-572 130, …RESPONDENT (BY SRI VENKATESH R, ADVOCATE) THIS CIVIL REVISION PETITION IS FILED UNDER SECTION 115 OF CODE OF CIVIL PROCEDURE, AGAINST THE ORDER DATED 27.04.2024 PASSED ON IA NO.II IN O.S.NO.59/2021 ON THE FILE OF SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, KUNIGAL, DISMISSING THE IA NO.II FILED UNDER ORDER 7 RULE 11(a) OF CODE OF CIVIL PROCEDURE, FOR REJECTION OF PLAINT. THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ADMISSION, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V SRISHANANDA ORAL ORDER Case called twice. None appears for the revision petitioners. Even in the last date of hearing there was no representation on behalf of the revision petitioners. - 3 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:52781 CRP No. 505 of 2024 2. Accordingly, revision petition stands dismissed for non prosecution. Sd/- (V SRISHANANDA) JUDGE MR