- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:48748 WP No. 10710 of 2023 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 25TH DAY OF NOVEMBER, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S SUNIL DUTT YADAV WRIT PETITION NO. 10710 OF 2023 (KLR-RR/SUR) BETWEEN: N.E RAJEGOWDA, S/O LATE EREGOWDA AGED ABOUT 69 YERS, NALIGERE VILLAGE, KASABA HOBLI, ARAKALAGUD TALUK, HASSAN DISTRICT- 573 102. …PETITIONER (BY SRI. SANCHAN JAI NANDAN.,ADVOCATE) AND: 1. STATE BY DEPUTY COMMISSIONER, HASSAN DISTRICT HASSAN- 573 127. 2. ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER, SAKALESHPURA SUB-DIVISION, SAKALESHPURAZ- 573 127. 3. TAHSILDAR ARAKALAGUD TALUK, ARAKALAGUD- 573 102 4. SRI. N.D.YOGESHA S/O LATE DYAVEGOWDA AGED ABOUT 52 YEARS Digitally signed by SUMA B N Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:48748 WP No. 10710 of 2023 5. SRI. N.S.ESHWARA S/O LATE SWAMYGOWDA AGED ABOUT 49 YEARS 6. SRI. SHIVARAJ S/O LATE SWAMYGOWDA AGED ABOUT MAJOR RESPONDENTS NO.4 TO 6 ARE RESIDING AT NAIGERE VILLAGE, KASABA HOBLI, ARAKALAGUD TALUK, HASSAN DISTRICT- 573 102. 7. SRI. KUMARASWAMY S/O LATE SWAMYGOWDA AGED MAJOR 8. SRI. JAYANNA S/O LATE SWAMYGOWDA AGED MAJOR RESPONDENTS NOS.7 AND 8 ARE R/AT CHIKKABIDRAKALLU VILLAGE, NEAR GANESHA TEMPLE, NAGASANDRA POST, BENGALURU- 560 073. 9. SRI. N.S. SATHISH S/O LATE SWAMYGOWDA AGED MAJOR OCC B M T C DRIVER, DIVISION NO.3 SHANTHINAGARA, BENGALURU. …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. SHAMANTH NAIK, HCGP) THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO QUASH THE ORDER NO.RP/21/2016-17 DATED 19.12.2019 PASSED BY THE R1 - 3 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:48748 WP No. 10710 of 2023 PRODUCED AT ANNEXURE-A AND TO QUASH THE ORDER NO.RA/106/2013-14 DATED 29.01.2016 PASSED BY THE R2 PRODUCED AT ANNEXURE-B AND ETC. THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S SUNIL DUTT YADAV ORAL ORDER No representation on behalf of the petitioner when the matter is called out. 2. This Court vide order dated 18.11.2025 has passed the following order; "When the matter was called in the morning session, there was no representation for the petitioner. Again when the matter was called out for the second time at 4.45 p.m., there was no representation for the petitioner. It is made clear that if the petitioner does not comply with the office objections by the next date of hearing, the Court would be constrained to pass necessary orders. List this matter in 'orders' list for dismissal on 25.11.2025." 3. Today also counsel for the petitioner is absent when the matter is called out. This would clearly indicate - 4 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:48748 WP No. 10710 of 2023 that the petitioner is not diligent in prosecuting the matter. Hence, petition is dismissed for non- prosecution. Sd/- (S SUNIL DUTT YADAV) JUDGE RU List No.: 1 Sl No.: 66