Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Rajasthan · body

2025 DAILYLAW 42613 (RAJ)

KADEER SON OF HABEEB MOHAMMED v. STATE OF RAJASTHAN

CRLMP/7456/2022 · 2025-02-13

Vinod Kumar Bharwani

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

[2025:RJ-JP:6411] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous (Petition) No. 7456/2022 Kadeer Son Of Habeeb Mohammed, Resident Of Awar, Police Station Pagaria, District Jhalawar (Raj). ----Petitioner Versus State Of Rajasthan, Through Public Prosecutor. ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Ali Mohammed Khan For Respondent(s) : Mr. Manvendra Singh Shekhawat, P.P. HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD KUMAR BHARWANI Order 13/02/2025 ;kph dh vksj ls fopkj.k U;k;ky;] fof'k"V U;k;k/kh'k ¼,u-Mh-ih-,l- izdj.k½ ,oa vij ls'ku U;k;k/kh'k] HkokuheaMh] ftyk >kykokM¼jkt-½ }kjk izFke lwpuk fjiksVZ la[;k&60@2022 iqfyl Fkkuk] feJksyh] ftyk&>kykokM esa ikfjr vkns'k fnukad 01-08-2022 ds fo:) ;g ;kfpdk is'k dh xbZ gSA vkyksP; vkns'k }kjk fopkj.k U;k;ky; us izdj.k esa tCr'kqnk okgu dkj VªsDl dzwlj Dykfld jftLVªs'ku la[;k RJ17UA3519 dks lqiqnZxh ij fn;s tkus gsrq ;kph dh vksj ls izLrqr izkFkZuk i= varxZr /kkjk 451 n.M izfdz;k lafgrk fujLr dj fn;kA vf/koDrk ;kph us U;k;ky; ds le{k fuosnu fd;k fd og tCr'kqnk okgu dk iathd`r Lokeh gS] mls okgu dh nSfud mi;ksx esa vko';drk gSA vuqla/kku vf/kdkjh }kjk izdj.k esa vuqla/kku iw.kZ dj fy;k x;k gSA okgu yEcs le; ls tCr gksdj iqfyl Fkkus esa [kqys esa iM+k gS ,oa okgu ds vfuf'pr le; rd [kM+k jgus ls mlds {kfrxzLr gksus dh laHkkouk gSA izdj.k ds fuLrkj.k esa le; yxus dh lEHkkouk gSA vr% ;kfpdk Lohdkj dj iz'uxr okgu dks lqiqnxhZ ij fn, tkus dk fuosnu fd;k x;kA [2025:RJ-JP:6411] (2 of 3) [CRLMP-7456/2022] fo}ku yksd vfHk;kstd us ;kfpdk ds tokc esa vafdr rF;ksa dks nksgjkrs gq, ;kfpdk fujLr djus dk fuosnu fd;kA geus izdj.k ds leLr rF;ksa ij fopkj fd;k x;kA vfHk;kstu dgkuh ds vuqlkj iz'uxr okgu ls fnukad 17-05-2022 dks gqbZ eknd inkFkZ dh cjkenxh ds vk/kkj ij mDr okgu dks tCr fd;k tkdj] okgu vHkh iqfyl vfHkj{kk esa gSA i=koyh ij izLrqr nLrkostkr ds vuqlkj orZeku ;kph tCr'kqnk okgu dk jftLVMZ Lokeh gSA vU; fdlh Hkh O;fDr dh vksj ls iz'uxr okgu dks lqiqnZxh ij izkIr djus gsrq vc rd dksbZ Dyse ugha fd;k x;k gS ,oa u gh vU; dksbZ izfrdwy ifjfLFkfr;ka U;k;ky; ds le{k mtkxj gqbZ gSaA iz'uxr okgu vfuf'pr le; rd okgu ds [kM+k jgus ls mlds {kfrxzLr ,oa vuqi;ksxh gksus dh lEHkkouk gSA vr% izdj.k ds rF;ksa ,oa ifjfLFkfr;ksa] fo}ku yksd vfHk;kstd }kjk iz'uxr okgu ds dze esa izLrqr rF;kRed fjiksVZ ,oa ekuuh; loksZPp U;k;ky; }kjk U;kf;d fofu'p;ksa&AIR 2003 SCC 638 Sunder Bai Amba Lal Desai Vs. State of Gujarat 2022, Supreme (SC) 1181 Sainaba Vs. State of Kerala, (2021) Supreme (Raj) 386 Devigan URF Degen Verman Vs. State of Rajasthan & (2022) Supreme (Raj) 232 Mandeep Vs. State of Rajasthan esa izfrikfnr fl)kUrksa dks /;ku esa j[krs gq, ;kph dks iz'uxr okgu lqiqnZxh ij iznku fd;k tkuk mfpr izrhr gksrk gSA ifj.kker% ;kph@lqiqnZxhZnkj dnhj iq= gchc eksgEen dh vksj ls izLrqr ;g ;kfpdk Lohdkj dh tkdj fopkj.k U;k;ky; dk vkyksP; vkns'k fnukafdr 01-08-2022 vikLr fd;k tkrk gS ,oa vkns'k fn;k tkrk gS fd ;kph dh vksj ls fopkj.k U;k;ky; ds larks"kizn ,oa vf/kjksfir 'krksZa ds v/khu vknsf'kr lqiqnxhZukek o tekurukek izLrqr dj rLnhd djk;s tkus ij izdj.k esa tCr'kqnk okgu dkj VªsDl dzwlj Dykfld jftLVªs'ku la[;k RJ17UA3519 dks ekuuh; loksZPp U;k;ky; ds U;kf;d fofu'p; AIR 2003 SCC 638 Sunder Bai Amba Lal Desai Vs. State of Gujarat esa izfrikfnr [2025:RJ-JP:6411] (3 of 3) [CRLMP-7456/2022] fn'kk&funsZ'kksa dh ikyuk djrs gq, ;kph dks lqiqnZxh ij iznku dj fn;k tk,A (VINOD KUMAR BHARWANI),J MAHESH ADWANI /128