Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 42610 (AP)

Banala Durga Prasad Alias Prasad v. The State of Andhra Pradesh

CRLP/10806/2025 · 2025-10-29

Y Lakshmana Rao

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

1 APHC010556352025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3521] THURSDAY,THE THIRTIETH DAY OF OCTOBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE Y. LAKSHMANA RAO CRIMINAL PETITION NO: 10806/2025 Between: Banala Durga Prasad Alias Prasad and Others ...PETITIONER/ACCUSED(S) AND The State Of Andhra Pradesh ...RESPONDENT/COMPLAINANT Counsel for the Petitioner/accused(S): 1. GOLLAPALLI MAHESWARA RAO Counsel for the Respondent/complainant: 1. PUBLIC PROSECUTOR The Court made the following: ORDER: The Criminal Petition has been filed under Sections 480 and 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 (for brevity ‘the BNSS’), seeking to enlarge the Petitioners/Accused Nos.1 & 2 on bail in Crime No.281 of 2025 of Gopalapatnam Police Station, Visakhapatnam District, registered against the Petitioners/Accused Nos.1 and 2 herein for the offences punishable under Section 20(b)(ii)(B) read with Section 8(c) of the Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985 (for brevity ‘the NDPS Act’). 2 2. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioners and the learned Assistant Public Prosecutor. Perused the record. 3. The petitioners/Accused Nos.1 and 2 were spot-arrested while in possession of 2.268 grams of ganja, which is not a commercial quantity. So far, five witnesses have been examined, all of whom are material and official witnesses. Therefore, the possibility of the petitioners threatening the official witnesses, tampering with evidence, or hampering the investigation does not arise. The petitioners are of an impressionable age of 19 years. The petitioners are permanent residents of Raikala Village and Mandal, Jagityala District, Telangana State. They have got fixed abode. If conditions are imposed, there is no likelihood of their absconding or evading the process of law. The learned Assistant Public Prosecutor submits that there are no similar criminal adverse antecedents against the petitioners. 4. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, the nature and gravity of allegations levelled against the Petitioners/Accused Nos.1 and 2, this Court is inclined to enlarge the Petitioners/Accused Nos.1 and 2 on bail. 5. In the result, the Criminal Petition is allowed with the following stringent conditions: i. The Petitioners/Accused Nos.1 and 2 shall be enlarged on bail subject to they executing bond for a sum of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand only) each with 3 two sureties for the like sum each to the satisfaction of the learned II Additional Metropolitan Magistrate, Visakhapatnam. ii. The Petitioners/Accused Nos.1 and 2 shall appear before the Station House Officer concerned, on every Saturday in between 10:00 am and 05:00 pm, till cognizance is taken by the learned the Trial Court. iii. The Petitioners/Accused Nos.1 and 2 shall not leave the limits of the State of Andhra Pradesh without prior permission from the Station House Officer concerned. iv. The Petitioners/Accused Nos.1 and 2 shall not commit or indulge in commission of any offence in future. v. The Petitioners/Accused Nos.1 and 2 shall not, directly or indirectly, make any inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the case so as to dissuade him/her from disclosing such facts to the court or to any police officer. vi. The Petitioners/Accused Nos.1 and 2 shall surrender their passport, if any, to the investigating officer. If they claim that they does not have a passport, they shall submit an affidavits to that effect to the Investigating Officer. _________________________ DR. Y. LAKSHMANA RAO, J Date: 30.10.2025 S D P 4 THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE Y. LAKSHMANA RAO CRIMINAL PETITION NO: 10806 OF 2025 30.10.2025 S D P