Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 42600 (ALL)

BALOO v. STATE OF U.P. AND OTHERS

WRIC/9765/2012 · 2025-07-28

Mahesh Chandra Tripathi, Prashant Kumar

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC:125590-DB Court No. - 29 Case :- WRIT - C No. - 9765 of 2012 Petitioner :- Baloo Respondent :- State of U.P. and Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Durga Prasad Tiwari,Shiv Kant Mishra Counsel for Respondent :- Anuj Srivastava,Ramendra Pratap Singh Hon'ble Mahesh Chandra Tripathi,J. Hon'ble Prashant Kumar,J. 1. The matter was taken up in the revised list. However, none appeared on behalf of the petitioner to press the petition, nor has any adjournment slip been moved. Shri Anuj Srivastava appears for NOIDA. 2. In view of the fact that the matter pertains to the year 2012 and in the absence of any effective representation, it appears that the cause of action has become stale and the writ petition has been rendered infructuous by efflux of time. 3. Accordingly, the writ petition is dismissed as infructuous. Order Date :- 29.7.2025 SP/ Digitally signed by :- SURYA PRAKASH High Court of Judicature at Allahabad