IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI C.M.P. No.127 of 2025 ------ Raj Kumar Mahto son of Late Raghuwar Mahto aged about 75 years, resident of village Oriya, P.O.- Guruwa, P.S. Lesliganj, District- Palamau … Petitioner Versus 1. The State of Jharkhand 2. Certificate Officer (vi), Electric Supply Area, Medininagar, P.O. and P.S. Sadar Daltonganj, District- Palamau (Jharkhand) 3. Jharkhand Urja Vikash Nigam Limited, through its Chairman cum Managing Director, hanving its office at Engineering Building, H.E.C. Dhurwa, P.O. Durwa, P.S. Jhagarnathpur, District- Ranchi (Jharkhand) 4. General Manager cum Chief Engineer, Jharkhand Vijli Vitaran Nigam Limited, P.O. and P.S. Sadar Daltonganj, District- Palamau (Jharkhand) … Opposite Parties ------ CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR CHOUDHARY ------ For the Petitioner : Mr. Baban Prasad, Advocate For the Opp. Parties : Mr. Om Prakash Tiwari, GP III Mr. Varun Pabhakar, AC to GP III Mr. Manish Kumar, Advocate ------ Order No:-02 Dated:-07-03-2025 Heard the parties. This civil miscellaneous petition has been filed by the petitioners with a prayer for restoration of W.P. (C) No.6366 of 2019 to its original file which stood dismissed for non-prosecution on 04.04.2024. It is submitted by the learned counsel for the petitioner that W.P. (C) No.6366 of 2019 stood dismissed for non-prosecution on 04.04.2024 by this Court. It is next submitted that the counsel for the petitioner could not mark the list, hence, no one appeared before this Court when the said W.P. (C) No.6366 of 2019 was called out for hearing, resulting in dismissal of the said W.P. (C) No.6366 of 2019 for non-prosecution. It is next submitted that non-prosecution before this Court on 04.04.2024 was neither deliberate nor intentional. It is also submitted that the petitioner has very good grounds to agitate in the said W.P. (C) No.6366 of 2019 and unless the same is restored to its original file, the petitioner will be highly prejudiced. Hence, it is submitted that the W.P. (C) No.6366 of 2019 be restored to its original file. Learned counsel for the opposite parties have not raised any serious objection. Considering the aforesaid submission of the learned counsel for the petitioner, W.P. (C) No.6366 of 2019 is directed to be restored to its original file at the same stage at which it was before its dismissal. Registry is directed to list W.P. (C) No.6366 of 2019 before the concerned Bench after a week. This civil miscellaneous petition is disposed of accordingly. (Anil Kumar Choudhary, J.) Animesh/