APHC010598242025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3208] FRIDAY, THE FOURTEENTH DAY OF NOVEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE D RAMESH WRIT PETITION NO: 31433/2025 Between: 1. B MOULI, S/O. SUBBARAMAIAH, AGED 46 YEARS, R/O. TALARIVETTU VILLAGE, VARADAIAHPALEM MANDAL, TIRUPATI DISTRICT. 2. B.SRINU, S/O. SIDDALAIAH, AGED 25 YEARS, R/O. TALARIVETTU VILLAGE, VARADAIAHPALEM MANDAL, TIRUPATI DISTRICT. ...PETITIONER(S) AND 1. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP. BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, REVENUE DEPARTMENT, A.P SECRETARIAT VELAGAPUDI, GUNTUR DISTRICT. 2. THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR, TIRUPATI DISTRICT, TIRUPATI 3. THE REVENUE DIVISIONAL OFFICER, SULLURPET, TIRUPATI DISTRICT. 4. THE TAHSILDAR, VARADAIAHPALEM MANDAL, TIRUPATI DISTRICT. 5. THE DEPUTY TAHSILDAR, VARADAIAHPALEM MANDAL, TIRUPATI DISTRICT. 6. THE MANDAL SURVEYOR, VARADAIAHPALEM MANDAL, TIRUPATI DISTRICT. 7. THE VILLAGE SURVEYOR, TALARIVETTU VILLAGE, 2 VARADAIAHPALEM MANDAL TIRUPATI DISTRICT. ...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased topleased to issue a writ or order or direction more particularly in the nature of Writ of Mandamusone declaring the orders in ROC.No.FL/372648/2025 and ROC.No. FL/372667/2025 dated 12.09.2025 passed by the 5th respondent rejecting the applications of petitioners for conducting a survey and demarcating the boundaries of the petitioners lands admeasuring Ac 0.36 Cents in Sy.No.86/5 and Ac.0.30 Cents in Sy.No.86/5A of Kurinjalam Village, Varadaiahpalem Mandal, Tirupati District as illegal, arbitrary, unconstitutional and violative of Article Constitution of India, Consequentially set-aside the respondents herein to conduct a 14, 21 and 300-A of the same and direct the survey and demarcate the boundaries of f the petitioners lands admeasuring Ac.0.36 Cents in Sy.No.86/5 and Ac 0.30 cents in Sy No. 86/5A of Kurinjalam Village Varadaiahpalem Mandal Tirupati District and to pass IA NO: 1 OF 2025 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased Pleased to suspend the orders in ROC.No.FL/372648/2025 and ROC.No.FL/372667/2025 dated 12.09.2025 passed by the 5th respondent, by directing the respondents herein to conduct a survey and demarcate the boundaries of the petitioners lands admeasuring Ac.0.36 Cents in Sy.No.86/5 and Ac.0.30 Cents in Sy.No.86/5A of Kurinjalam Village, Varadaiahpalem Mandal, Tirupati District pending disposal of the above writ petition and pass Counsel for the Petitioner(S): 1. V VINOD K REDDY Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. GP FOR REVENUE The Court made the following: 3 THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE D.RAMESH WRIT PETITION NO: 31433 of 2025 ORDER: This writ petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of the India seeking the following relief:- “to issue a writ, order or direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the orders in ROC No.FL/372648/2025 and ROC.No.FL/372667/2025, dated 12.09.2025 passed by the 5th respondent rejecting the applications of the petitioners for conducting a survey and demarcating the boundaries of the petitioners lands admeasuring Ac.0.36 cents in Sy.No.86/5 and Ac.0.30 cents in Sy.No.86/5A of Kurinjalam village, Varadaiahpalem Mandal, Tirupathi District as illegal and arbitrary”. 2. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioners and the learned Assistant Government Pleader for Revenue. 3. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the 5th respondent has considered the F-line applications filed by the petitioners and rejected the same vide impugned proceedings dated 12.09.2025. The reasons mentioned in the rejection order is that the petitioners are not in the possession of the subject property. The said observations are contrary to the records. In fact, as per the latest adangals, the petitioners are in possession of subject property and their names are reflecting in the latest adangals. 4 4. On perusal of record and considering the said submissions made by the learned counsel for the petitioners, the impugned proceedings dated 12.09.2025 are hereby set aside, remanding the matter to the 4th respondent once again to conduct survey and pass appropriate orders based on the records after providing opportunity of hearing to the petitioners. The above said exercise should be completed within a period of four weeks from the date of receipt of copy of this order. 5. Accordingly, the Writ Petition is disposed of. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel miscellaneous applications, pending, if any, shall also stand closed. __________________ JUSTICE D.RAMESH Dt:14.11.2025 sj 5 122 THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE D. RAMESH WRIT PETITION NO: 31433 of 2025 14.11.2025 ssjj