Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Rajasthan · body

2025 DAILYLAW 42592 (RAJ)

THAKUR LAL S/O SHRI JAI SINGH v. STATE OF RAJASTHAN

CW/11729/2025 · 2025-12-18

Ashok Kumar Jain

Transfer Petitionbody2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

[2025:RJ-JP:51591] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 11729/2025 Thakur Lal S/o Shri Jai Singh, Aged About 36 Years, R/o Tehsil Nadbai, Gagwana, District Bharatpur (Rajasthan). ----Petitioner Versus 1. State Of Rajasthan, Through Its Principal Secretary, Department Of Elementary Education, Government Of Rajasthan, Secretariat, Jaipur. 2. The Director, Elementary Education Bikaner. 3. The Director, Women And Child Welfare Department, 2, Jalpath, Gandhi Nagar, Jaipur. 4. Superintendent Of Police, District Karauli. 5. Rajasthan Staff Selection Board, Durgapura, Jaipur. ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Sukhdev Singh Solanki For Respondent(s) : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ASHOK KUMAR JAIN Order 18/12/2025 1. This writ petition has been filed by the petitioner with the following prayer:- (a) Issue an appropriate writ order or direction in the nature the Respondents may direct the participate in selection process and give the joining on the post of Pre-Primary Teacher in the interest of justice; (b) the respondent No.4 may directed to relieve the petitioner from the post of Constable for joining of post of Pre-Primary Teacher in the interest of justice; [2025:RJ-JP:51591] (2 of 2) [CW-11729/2025] 2. During course of arguments, learned counsel for petitioner submits that the petitioner may be granted permission to file an appropriate representation before the respondents-Authority to consider and resolve his grievances. 3. Considered the grievance raised herein, the petitioner is given a liberty to submit a representation to the respondents- Authority within a period of 30 days raising all grounds and the respondents-Authority are directed to consider and decide the representation after enquiry about grievances, raised by the petitioner but with a reasoned and speaking order within a period of 30 days from date of receipt of representation. After the decision, the respondents are under an obligation to communicate the decision to the petitioner either by way of speed post or through E-mail, if petitioner has provided E-mail in his representation. If the petitioner is still aggrieved, he is at liberty to approach this Court with fresh petition. 4. With the aforesaid directions, the present writ petition with pending application, if any, stands disposed of. (ASHOK KUMAR JAIN),J GAURAV /21