SHAIK HASEENA BEGUM v. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH
WP/28521/2025 · 2025-11-03
D Ramesh
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 42589 (AP) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 42589 (AP) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
APHC010546172025
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3208] TUESDAY, THE FOURTH DAY OF NOVEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE D RAMESH WRIT PETITION NO: 28521/2025 Between:
1. SHAIK HASEENA BEGUM, W/O. SHAIK MASTAN, AGED ABOUT 53 YEARS, HOUSEWIFE, R/O. 19/381, HAJI GAFOOR SAHEB STREET, KADAPA MANDAL, YSR KADAPA DISTRICT. ...PETITIONER AND
1. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP. BY PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, REVENUE DEPARTMENT, ANDHRA PRADESH SECRETARIAT, VELAGAPUDI, AMARAVATI, GUNTUR DISTRICT. 2. THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR KADAPA, YSR KADAPA DISTRICT- 516001
3. THE TAHSILDAR, VALLUR MANDAL, YSR KADAPA DISTRICT -
516293. 4. THE SUBREGISTRAR, RURAL KADAPA ,YSR KADAPA DISTRICT - 516002
...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue an appropriate Writ, Order or Direction, more particularly one in the nature of a Writ of Mandamus, declaring the inaction of the respondents in not deleting the land admeasuring Ac. 4.52 cents in
2
Sy. No. 1177 of Ambavaram Village, Vallur Mandal, YSR Kadapa District, from the list of prohibited properties furnished to the respondent No.4 under Section 22-A(1) of the Registration Act,1908, as illegal, arbitrary and violative of Articles 14, 19, 21 and 300- A of the Constitution of India, and consequently direct the respondent No.4 to receive, register and release any document presented by the petitioner in respect of the subject landby setting aside the prohibitory land list communicated by the respondent No. 2 and 3, through proceedings No. POT/364/2016 dated 10-03-2018 and pass. IA NO: 1 OF 2025 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the respondent No.4 to receive, register and release any document presented by the petitioner in respect of the land admeasuring Ac. 4.52 cents in Sy. No. 1177 of Ambavaram Village, Vallur Mandal, YSR Kadapa District, without reference to the proceedings No. POT/364/2016 dated 10.03.2018, pending disposal of the above Writ Petition, and pass. Counsel for the Petitioner:
1. MUJTAHID HUSSAIN Counsel for the Respondent(S):
1. GP FOR REVENUE
2.
GP FOR REGISTRATION AND STAMPS The Court made the following:
3
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE D.RAMESH
WRIT PETITION No.28521 OF 2025
ORDER: The present Writ Petition is filed, under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, seeking the following relief:
“to issue any writ, order or direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus or an appropriate writ or order declaring the inaction of the respondents in not deleting the land admeasuring Ac. 4.52 cents in Sy. No.1177 of Ambavaram Village, Vallur Mandal, YSR Kadapa District, from the list of prohibited properties furnished to the respondent No.4 under Section 22-A(1) of the Registration Act,1908, as illegal, arbitrary and violative of Articles 14, 19, 21 and 300- A of the Constitution of India, and consequently direct the respondent No.4 to receive, register and release any document presented by the petitioner in respect of the subject land by setting aside the prohibitory land list communicated by the respondent No.2 and 3, through proceedings No. POT/364/2016 dated 10-03-2018 and pass such other order or orders….”
2. Heard M/s.Mujtahid Hussain, learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned Government Pleader for the respondents. 3. The grievance of the petitioner in this Writ Petition is that despite submitting applications dated 25.01.2019, 30.11.2020, and 08.4.2022 seeking to delete the subject property from the list of prohibited properties, furnished to the respondent no.4 under Section 22-A(1) of the Registration Act, 1908, no action has been taken so far. Hence the Writ Petition. 4
4. Learned Assistant Government Pleader appearing for the respondents, on instructions, has submitted that, if a fresh on-line application is filed, the authorities will consider the application submitted by the petitioner and pass appropriate orders after giving notice to the concerned persons. 5.
Considering the above submissions made by both the learned counsel, without going into the merits, the petitioner is directed to file on-line application afresh within a period of two (02) weeks and on filing such application, the District Collector concerned is directed to consider and dispose of the same, after getting report from the concerned Revenue Divisional Officer and Tahsildar, within a period of two (02) months thereafter. 6. Accordingly, the writ petition is disposed of. No costs. As a sequel thereto, interlocutory applications pending, if any, in the writ petition, shall also stand closed. ___________________ JUSTICE D.RAMESH
04.11.2025 RD
5
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE D.RAMESH
WRIT PETITION NO.28521 OF 2025 04.11.2025 RD