MRS. RAMESHWARI W/O MR. PANCHULAL v. THE STATE OF RAJASTHAN
CRLMB/16212/2025 · 2025-12-16
Anand Sharma
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 42584 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 42584 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
[2025:RJ-JP:50620] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 16212/2025 Mrs. Rameshwari W/o Mr. Panchulal, Aged About 55 Years, R/o Sansiyon Ka Mohalla, Bhinaye, Police Station Bhinaye, District Ajmer, Currently Tenant Of Omprakashs House, Plot No. 1B, Girdhar Colony, Sikar Road, Police Station Murlipura, Jaipur (West) (At Present Confined At Mahila Jail, Jaipur). ----Petitioner Versus The State Of Rajasthan, Through Pp ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Ms. Nikita Sharma, Adv. for Mr. Girraj P. Sharma, Adv. For Respondent(s) : Mr. Vivek Sharma, PP HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANAND SHARMA Order 16/12/2025
1. This criminal misc. bail application has been filed by the petitioner under Section 483 of BNSS, 2023 in respect of FIR No.0466/2025 registered at Police Station Murlipura, Jaipur (West) for the offence punishable under Section 8/21 of NDPS Act. 2. It is stated by learned counsel for the petitioner that the petitioner has falsely been implicated in the FIR, whereas she has not committed any offence whatsoever. While effecting recovery of alleged contraband, provisions of Section 50 of NDPS Act were not followed and there is no independent witness in the matter. It is submitted that even otherwise the alleged recovered quantity of smack is 50.17 grams which is less than commercial quantity. Petitioner is a lady and is behind the bars since
[2025:RJ-JP:50620] (2 of 3) [CRLMB-16212/2025]
27.11.2025. No other recovery is to be made effective from the petitioner and investigation from the petitioner is complete. Hence, a prayer has been made to grant bail to the petitioner. 3. Learned Public Prosecutor has vehemently opposed this bail application. 4. Considered the submissions made at Bar. 5. In view of the fact that it has come in the order passed by the Special Judge, NDPS Cases, that there were no independent witnesses of recovery as well as the fact that the quantity allegedly recovered from the petitioner is less than commercial quantity and considering that the petitioner is a lady, without expressing any opinion on the merits and demerits of the case, this Court deems it just and proper to enlarge the petitioner on bail. 6. Accordingly, this Bail Application is hereby allowed. The accused-petitioner Mrs. Rameshwari W/o Mr. Panchulal shall be released on bail in pursuance of FIR No.0466/2025 registered at Police Station Murlipura, Jaipur (West) on furnishing a personal bond of Rs. 1,00,000/- along with two sureties of Rs.1,00,000/- each.
That apart, the accused-petitioner shall also follow the conditions as under:- (i) She shall not tamper with any evidence, nor would influence the witnesses in the case. (ii) She shall not leave the country without prior permission of the Court. [2025:RJ-JP:50620] (3 of 3) [CRLMB-16212/2025] (iii) She shall co-operate in the trial and shall attend each and every date of hearing in the trial, until and unless her presence is exempted by the trial Court. (iv) She shall regularly mark her attendance in the concerned Police Station on 25th day of every month. Concerned S.H.O. shall maintain the register of attendance of the accused-petitioner. (v) On repetition of similar nature of offence during trial, the instant bail shall stand automatically cancelled. (ANAND SHARMA),J Jatin /276