KUNJILAL @ KUNJA S/O BANWARI LAL v. STATE OF RAJASTHAN
CRLMB/10625/2025 · 2025-10-28
Pramil Kumar Mathur
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 42583 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 42583 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
[2025:RJ-JP:43268] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 10625/2025 Kunjilal @ Kunja S/o Banwari Lal, Aged About 27 Years, R/o Khandeep, Police Station Wazirpur, District Sawai Madhopur. (Presently Confined In District Jail, Sawai Madhopur). ----Petitioner Versus State Of Rajasthan, Through Pp ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Rahul Sharma, Ms. Chanchal, Mr. Utkarsh Goyal and Mr. Apurv Goyal for Mr. Rajneesh Gupta For Respondent(s) : Mr. Jaiprakash Tiwari, PP HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRAMIL KUMAR MATHUR
Order 28/10/2025
1. The petitioner has filed this bail application under Section 483 of BNSS in FIR No.17/2025 registered at Police Station Kotwali Sawai Madhopur District Sawai Madhopur for offence under Section 303(2) of BNS-2023.
2. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner as well as learned Public Prosecutor and perused the material available on record.
3.
Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner has falsely been implicated in this case. He further submits that the allegation against the present petitioner is of stealing the vehicle-Tata Harrier XT Plus bearing No. RJ 51-CA-7994. The so called vehicle was not recovered from the possession of the accused-petitioner. Though there are 14 cases pending against the
[2025:RJ-JP:43268] (2 of 3) [CRLMB-10625/2025] petitioner. Co-accused-Dileep Singh @ Kunji has been enlarged on bail by this Court on 06.05.2025. Petitioner is behind the bars since 26.07.2025. The trial of the case will take considerable time, therefore, no fruitful purpose would be served by keeping the petitioner in further custody and the bail application of the petitioner may be allowed.
4. Learned Public Prosecutor has vehemently opposed the bail application.
5. On consideration of the rival submissions and material available on record and in the light of submission made by learned counsel for the petitioner but without expressing any opinion on merits/demerits of the case, I am inclined to grant benefit of bail to the petitioner.
6. Consequently, the bail application under Section 483 B.N.S.S. is allowed and it is directed that the petitioner Kunjilal @ Kunja S/o Banwari Lal be released on bail provided he furnishes a personal bond in the sum of Rs.50,000/- with two sureties in the sum of Rs.25,000/- each to the satisfaction of the learned trial court with the stipulation that he shall appear before that Court on all subsequent dates of hearing till conclusion of the trial with following further conditions:- (i) that the petitioner shall mark his presence before the SHO, Police Station Kotwali Sawai Madhopur District Sawai Madhopur in every 15 days of each month till conclusion of trial. (ii) The concerned SHO is directed to maintain a register for this purpose. In case, the petitioner fails
[2025:RJ-JP:43268] (3 of 3) [CRLMB-10625/2025] to mark his presence in the concerned Police Station as directed above, the concerned SHO is directed to immediately report the matter to trial court in this regard. (iii) If breach of any of the directions is reported or come to the notice of the trial court the same shall alone be a reason for learned Public Prosecutor to apply for cancellation of bail.
(PRAMIL KUMAR MATHUR),J Arun/3