DHARMENDRA CHOUDHARY @ DHARMRAJ S/O SHRI BAJRANG LAL v. STATE OF RAJASTHAN
CRLMB/13115/2025 · 2025-12-16
Vinod Kumar Bharwani
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 42582 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 42582 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
[2025:RJ-JP:50801] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 13115/2025 Dharmendra Choudhary @ Dharmraj S/o Shri Bajrang Lal, Aged About 24 Years, R/o Kalakh Khatolai, Police Station Jobner, District Jaipur, Currently Resident Of Flat No. 401, Priya Vihar, Vaishali Nagar, Police Station Vaishali Nagar, Jaipur. (At Present Confined At Central Jail Jaipur). ----Petitioner Versus State Of Rajasthan, Through PP ----Respondent Connected With S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 14442/2025 Ramesh Kumar Jat S/o Shri Arjunlal Jat, R/o Village Haripura, Jobner, Police Station Jobner, District Jaipur, Presently Tenant Plot No. 3/24, Sector 3, Chitrakoot, Police Station Chitrakoot, Vaishali Nagar, Jaipur. (At Present Confined In Central Jail, Jaipur) ----Petitioner Versus State Of Rajasthan, Through PP ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Sanjeev Sogarwal For Respondent(s) : Mr. Onkar Singh Rajpurohit, P.P. Mr. Ansh Garg S/o Sanjeev Garg (complainant present-in-person) HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD KUMAR BHARWANI
Order 16/12/2025 The instant bail applications have been filed under Section 483 B.N.S.S. on behalf of accused-petitioners in the matter arising out of F.I.R. No.593/2025 registered at Police Station Shipra Path
[2025:RJ-JP:50801] (2 of 3) [CRLMB-13115/2025] District Jaipur City (South) for the offence(s) punishable under Section(s) 140(2), 115(2), 126(2) & 308(2) of B.N.S.
Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the petitioners have been falsely implicated in the case, they have nothing to do with the alleged offence(s) and they are behind the bars since 11.10.2025 & 26.09.2025 respectively. Counsel further submits that a compromise dated 10.12.2025 has been arrived at between the parties by way of mutual consent. Trial of the case is likely to take a long time to conclude, till then, their further incarceration would not serve any fruitful purpose and they are ready and willing to furnish their bail bonds. Therefore, the bail applications deserve to be allowed. Learned Public Prosecutor has vehemently opposed the bail applications. Mr. Ansh Garg S/o Sanjeev Garg (complainant) is present-in- person before this Court and he has no objection if the bail applications are allowed as the parties have entered into a compromise. Heard learned counsel for the parties and perused the material made available on record. The compromise dated 10.12.2025 is taken on record. Taking into consideration the submissions put forth and overall facts & circumstances of the case but without commenting upon detailed merits of the case, this Court deems it fit to enlarge the accused-petitioners on bail. Therefore, the bail applications are allowed. Accused- petitioners, namely Dharmendra Choudhary @ Dharmraj S/o Shri
[2025:RJ-JP:50801] (3 of 3) [CRLMB-13115/2025] Bajrang Lal & Ramesh Kumar Jat S/o Shri Arjunlal Jat, shall be released on bail, if they are not required in any other case, provided each of them furnishes a personal bond in the sum of Rs.50,000/- (Fifty Thousand) together with two sureties in the sum of Rs.25,000/- (Twenty-five Thousand) each to the satisfaction of the learned trial court with the stipulation that they shall appear before that Court and any other court to which the matter is transferred, on all subsequent dates of hearing and as and when they are called upon to do so.
(VINOD KUMAR BHARWANI),J SAURABH /78-79