Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 42582 (AP)

SRI SAI SAMHITHA CONSTRUCTIONS v. The State of Andhra Pradesh

WP/30418/2025 · 2025-11-25

Ravi Cheemalapati

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

APHC010581362025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3332] WEDNESDAY, THE TWENTY SIXTH DAY OF NOVEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE RAVI CHEEMALAPATI WRIT PETITION NO: 30418/2025 Between: 1. SRI SAI SAMHITHA CONSTRUCTIONS, REP ITS MANAGING PARTNER, K.V.G.KRISHNA REDDY, S/O DARMA REDDY, AGED ABOUT 52 YEARS, OCC. BUSINESS, R/O D.NO.6-294, RAVULAPALEM VILLAGE AND MANDAL, DR.BR AMBEDKAR KONASEEMA DISTRICT. ...PETITIONER AND 1. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP. BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, DEPARTMENT OF FINANCE AND PLANNING, SECRETARIAT BUILDINGS, VELAGAPUDI, GUNTUR DISTRICT. 2. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP. BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, PANCHAYAT RAJ DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT BUILDINGS,VELAGAPUDI, GUNTUR DISTRICT. 3. THE CHIEF ENGINEER PANCHAYAT RAJ AND RURAL DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT, BANDAR ROAD, VIJAYAWADA, KRISHNA DISTRICT. 2 4. THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR, AMALAPURAM, DR.BR AMBEDKAR KONASEEMA DISTRICT. 5. THE SUPERINTENDENT OF ENGINEER PANCHAYAT RAJ DEPARTMENT, KAKINADA, KAKINADA DISTRICT. 6. THE EXECUTIVE ENGINEER PANCHAYAT RAJ DIVISION, AMALAPURAM, DR.BR AMBEDKAR KONASEEMA DISTRICT. ...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased toPleased to issue an appropriate writ or order or a direction more particularly one in the nature of writ of MANDAMUS declaring the action of the respondents, in non-payment of amount due to me even after finalizing the bills, payable to them in relation to the works executed by them under GGMP funds Providing CC road from Mulagulati Rudrayya house to Yarlagadda Sriramulu house, Kondeti Manga House to Kapa Devid and Komara Bose to SC Community Hall at Kommarajulanka-2 as illegal, arbitrary, unjust, unreasonable and unconstitutional and consequently direct the respondents to consider the payment of amount due to the petitioner in respect of execution of works forthwith and to pass IA NO: 1 OF 2025 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased To direct the respondents to consider the payment of amount payable to the petitioner.Providing CC road from Mulagulati Rudrayya house to Yarlagadda Sriramulu house, Kondeti Manga House to Kapa Devid and Komara Bose to SC Community Hall at Kommarajulanka-2 immediately, pending disposal of the main writ petition and pass 3 Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. SRIDHAR TUMMALAPUDI Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. GP FOR PANCHAYAT RAJ RURAL DEV 2. GP FOR REVENUE 3. GP FOR FINANCE PLANNING The Court made the following ORDER: Aggrieved by the action of the respondents in non- payment of bill amounts to the petitioner in relation to the works executed by providing CC road from Mulagulati Rudrayya House to Yarlagadda Sriramulu House and Kondeti Manga House to Kapa Devid & Komara Bose to SC Community Hall at Kommarajulanka-2, the present writ petition has been filed. 2. Heard Sri Sridhar Tummalapudi, learned counsel for the petitioner and Ms. Naga Chandrika, learned Assistant Government Pleader for Panchayat Raj. 3. Ms. Naga Chandrika, learned Assistant Government Pleader for Panchayat Raj, on written instructions dated 14.11.2025 submitted that the authorities have admitted to pay to a tune of Rs.9,28,033/- as against the claim made by the 4 petitioner to a tune of Rs.10,34,494/- and sought time for such payment. 4. To the said submission, learned counsel for the petitioner reported no objection but prayed to grant reasonable time as the amount is paltry. 5. Taking into consideration the submissions of both the learned counsel and as the authorities are ready to pay the admitted amount to the petitioner, this court is inclined to dispose of the writ petition, at the admission stage with the following direction: “The respondents are directed to release the legally admitted/entitled net amount to the petitioner at the earliest, and at any rate, within two (02) months from the date of receipt of a copy of this order.” 6. Accordingly, the writ petition is disposed of. No costs. Miscellaneous applications, pending if any, shall stand closed. _________________________ JUSTICE RAVI CHEEMALAPATI Date: 26.11.2025 ANS 5 113 THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE RAVI CHEEMALAPATI WRIT PETITION NO: 30418/2025 Date: 26.11.2025 ANS