IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Sr. No.120 Shishu Ram Pal State of Haryana CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE DEEPAK SIBAL HON'BLE M Present : Mr. Mr. DEEPAK SIBAL, J 1. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that at this stage, he would be satisfied if the present writ petition is disposed of wit Commissioner, Karnal (Annexure P-10), 2. Learned State counsel, who appears on advance notice, has no objection if the above prayer is accepted. 3. Accordingly, at this stage, without commenting on the merits of the case, the writ petition is disposed o take a decision on the of the petitioner, by passing a speaking order and after affording opportunity of hearing to all concerned copy of this order. 4. Needless to add that the decision so taken be communicated to the petitioner and if the decision is not to the satisfaction of the petitioner liberty to challenge the same, in accordance with law. 24.07.2025 Prince IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Versus and others HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE DEEPAK SIBAL HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE LAPITA BANERJI Mr. Abhishek Dhull, Advocate, for the petitioner. r. Saurabh Mago, DAG, Haryana. * * * * * DEEPAK SIBAL, J. (Oral) Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that at this stage, he would be satisfied if the present writ petition is disposed of wit Karnal to take a decision on the ), made on behalf of the petitioner. Learned State counsel, who appears on advance notice, has no objection if the above prayer is accepted. Accordingly, at this stage, without commenting on the merits of the case, the writ petition is disposed of with a direction to on the legal notice dated 29.08.2024 the petitioner, by passing a speaking order and after affording opportunity of all concerned, preferably within two month copy of this order. Needless to add that the decision so taken be communicated to the petitioner and if the decision is not to the satisfaction of the petitioner challenge the same, in accordance with law. Whether speaking/reasoned : Yes / No Whether reportable : Yes / No IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CWP-10716-2025 Date of decision : 24.07.2025 .…. Petitioner ..... Respondent HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE DEEPAK SIBAL LAPITA BANERJI , Advocate, for the petitioner. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that at this stage, he would be satisfied if the present writ petition is disposed of with a direction to Deputy on on the legal notice dated 29.08.2024 Learned State counsel, who appears on advance notice, has no objection Accordingly, at this stage, without commenting on the merits of the case, to Deputy Commissioner, Karnal to 29.08.2024 (Annexure P-10), made on behalf the petitioner, by passing a speaking order and after affording opportunity of months from the date of receipt of a Needless to add that the decision so taken be communicated to the petitioner and if the decision is not to the satisfaction of the petitioner, he would be at challenge the same, in accordance with law. [DEEPAK SIBAL] JUDGE [LAPITA BANERJI] JUDGE Yes / No Yes / No 5 Respondents Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that at this stage, he would be Deputy 29.08.2024 Learned State counsel, who appears on advance notice, has no objection Accordingly, at this stage, without commenting on the merits of the case, to on behalf the petitioner, by passing a speaking order and after affording opportunity of from the date of receipt of a Needless to add that the decision so taken be communicated to the would be at PRINCE SAINI 2025.07.25 02:27 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document