HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD APPLICATION U/S 482 No. - 10197 of 2024 Court No. - 89 HON'BLE JITENDRA KUMAR SINHA, J. 1. Heard Sri Gyanesh Kumar Misra, Advocate, holding brief of Sri Uma Dutt Shukla, learned counsel for the applicant, Sri Surendra Kumar Tripathi, learned counsel for opposite party no. 2 and Sri Chnadra Shekhar Saran, learned A.G.A. for the State respondents. 2. This application under Section 482 Cr.P.C. has been preferred for quashing the entire proceeding of Criminal Case No. 104 of 2023 (State vs. Lokendra and Others) pending before the court of Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Court No.4, Agra. 3. It is contended by learned counsel for the applicant that the applicant and opposite party no. 2 have entered into compromise and the same has been verified by the learned Court concerned and a report regarding the same has been filed along with supplementary affidavit which is on the record. It is also submitted that in view of the compromise arrived at between the applicant and opposite party no. 2, proceedings of the aforesaid case be quashed against the applicant. 4. On the other hand, learned counsel for the opposite party no. 2 and learned A.G.A. for the State have no objection to the above submissions made by learned counsel for the applicant. 5. In view of the fact that the applicant and opposite party no. 2 have entered into compromise and the said compromise has been verified by the learned Court concerned and a report regarding verification of compromise is already on record and keeping in view of the law laid down by Hon'ble Supreme Court in the case of State of Madhya Pradesh vs. Laxmi Narayan and others, AIR 2019 SC 1296 and the facts of the matter, it would be in the interest of justice that the impugned proceedings be quashed in respect of the applicant. It was stated that in view of these facts and circumstances, no useful purpose would be served by keeping the impugned proceedings pending and thus, the impugned proceedings may be quashed on the basis of compromise arrived at between the parties. Versus Counsel for Applicant(s) : Mohd. Samiuzzaman Khan, Sonmati Kumari, Uma Dutt Shukla Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A., Surendra Kumar Tripathi Yogesh .....Applicant(s) State of U.P. and Another .....Opposite Party(s) 6. In view of the aforesaid, the entire proceeding of Criminal Case No. 104 of 2023 (State vs. Lokendra and Others) pending before the court of Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Court No.4, Agra are hereby quashed. 7. The application under Section 482 Cr.P.C. stands allowed. September 18, 2025 Madhurima A482 No. 10197 of 2024 2 (Jitendra Kumar Sinha,J.) Digitally signed by :- MADHURIMA GARG High Court of Judicature at Allahabad