Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Rajasthan · body

2025 DAILYLAW 42568 (RAJ)

SMT. SUMITRA W/O SHRI SOORAJKARAN v. THE STATE OF RAJASTHAN

CRLMB/16181/2025 · 2025-12-19

Anand Sharma

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

[2025:RJ-JP:51459] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No.16181/2025 1. Smt. Sumitra W/o Shri Soorajkaran, Aged About 40 Years, R/o Chak Pinglod, Police Station Roopangarh, District Ajmer. (At Present Petitioner Is Confined In Central Jail, Ajmer). 2. Smt. Kaushalya Devi W/o Shri Shyokaran, Aged About 43 Years, R/o Dahad Ki Dhani, Gram Chak Pinglod, Police Station Roopangarh, District Ajmer. (At Present Petitioner Is Confined In Central Jail, Ajmer). 3. Kum. Sanjana Choudhary @ Sanju D/o Shri Shyokaran Nuwad, Aged About 19 Years, R/o Gram Chak Pinglod, Police Station Roopangarh, District Ajmer. (At Present Petitioner Is Confined In Central Jail, Ajmer). ----Accused/Petitioners Versus The State of Rajasthan through Public Prosecutor. ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Shyam Bihari Gautam For Respondent(s) : Mr. Vivek Sharma, PP HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANAND SHARMA Order 19/12/2025 1. This criminal miscellaneous bail application has been filed by the accused-petitioners under Section 483 of Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 in respect of FIR No.143/2025 registered at Police Station-Rupangarh, District-Ajmer, for the offences punishable under Sections 115(2), 126(2), 329(4) & 189(2) of Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023. 2. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the petitioners are ladies and have falsely been implicated in the [2025:RJ-JP:51459] (2 of 3) [CRLMB-16181/2025] criminal case, whereas, fact of the case is that complainant side has started the fight, therefore, cross FIRs have been lodged. He also submits that injuries sustained by the injured in the present FIR are simple in nature. Petitioners are behind the Bars since 29.11.2025 and trial of this case is likely to take considerably long time, therefore, the accused-petitioner may be allowed to be enlarged on bail. 3. Learned Public Prosecutor has opposed the present bail application. 4. Having considered the submissions made by the learned counsel for the petitioners as well as learned Public Prosecutor and in view of the fact that cross-cases have been lodged pursuant to same incident and the petitioners are ladies and injuries informed to this Court against the injured are simple in nature, this Court without expressing any opinion on the merits and demerits of the case, deems it just and proper to enlarge the petitioners on bail. 5. Accordingly, this Bail Application is hereby allowed. The accused-petitioners Smt. Sumitra W/o Soorajkaran, Smt. Kaushalya Devi W/o Shyokaran & Kum. Sanjna Choudhary @ Sanju D/o Shyokaran Nuwad shall be released on bail in pursuance of FIR No.143/2025 registered at Police Station- Rupangarh, District-Ajmer on furnishing a personal bond of Rs. 1,00,000/- each along with two sureties of Rs.50,000/- each. That apart, the accused-petitioners shall also follow the conditions as under:- [2025:RJ-JP:51459] (3 of 3) [CRLMB-16181/2025] (i) They shall not tamper with any evidence, nor would influence the witnesses in the case. (ii) They shall not leave the country without prior permission of the Court. (iii) They shall co-operate in the trial and shall attend each and every date of hearing in the trial, until and unless their presence is exempted by the trial Court. (ANAND SHARMA),J DAKSH/187