GUNDLAPAKA SHOBARANI, PRAKASAM DIST v. POKURI AUDILAKSHMI, PRAKASAM DIST & TWO OTHERS
CMA/198/2017 · 2025-12-22
Maheswara Rao Kuncheam, Ravi Nath Tilhari
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 42568 (AP) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 42568 (AP) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
APHC010206852017
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3524] TUESDAY,THE TWENTY THIRD DAY OF DECEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE RAVI NATH TILHARI THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE MAHESWARA RAO KUNCHEAM CIVIL MISCELLANEOUS APPEAL NO: 198/2017 Between:
1. GUNDLAPAKA SHOBARANI, PRAKASAM DIST, W/O. JANARDHANA RAO, R/O. PLOT.NO. 486, L.B.S.NAGAR, VIJAYAWADA, PRAKASAM DISTRICT.
...APPELLANT AND
1. POKURI AUDILAKSHMI PRAKASAM DIST TWO OTHERS, W/O.
LATE VENKATESWARLU, OCC: AGRICULTURAL COOLIE, R/O. D.NO. 4-12 (1), BATCHALAKURAPADU, SC COLONY, KONAKANAMETLA VILLAGE AND MANDAL, PRAKASAM DISTRICT.
2. PROJECT DIRECTOR I C D S BALA SADHAN, 3RD LANE, RAMNAGAR, ONGOLE, PRAKASAM DISTRICT.
3. INSPECTOR OF POLICE, PODILI CIRCLE, PRAKASAM DISTRICT.
...RESPONDENT(S): Appeal Under Section_____against ordersto set aside the Judgment
order in dt: 01-02-2016 in G.W.O.P.No. 20 of 2012 on the court of the Principal District Judge, Prakasam at Ongole by allowing the same, and be pleased to pass
Counsel for the Appellant:
1. CHALLA AJAY KUMAR Counsel for the Respondent(S):
2
The Court made the following:
JUDGMENT: (per Hon’ble Sri Justice Maheswara Rao Kuncheam)
The petition filed seeking appointment as guardian of minor child as well as other reliefs under Section 6 and 7 r/w. Section 9 and 10 of Hindu Guardians and Wards Act, 1980, was dismissed by the learned Principal District Judge, Ongole. Aggrieved by the same, the present appeal was preferred.
2. There is no representation on either side.
3. On a perusal of the material available on record, it appears that in view of efflux of time, the minor child had attained majority, as such, she is at liberty to live as per her own will and wish.
4. Therefore, the appeal is dismissed as infructuous.
5. No order as to costs. As a sequel, all pending applications shall stand closed. ___________________ RAVI NATH TILHARI, J
_____________________________ MAHESWARA RAO KUNCHEAM, J GVK
3
97 THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE RAVI NATH TILHARI AND THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE MAHESWARA RAO KUNCHEAM
CIVIL MISCELLANEOUS APPEAL No.198 of 2017
Dt. 23.12.2025
GVK