APHC010646872025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3396] THURSDAY, THE FOURTH DAY OF DECEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA WRIT PETITION NO: 33757/2025 Between: 1. MODIUM MUTYALARAO, S/O. CHELLAIAH, AGED ABOUT 48 YEARS,OCC CULTIVATION, R/O. TAPASSIUMIGUDEN DARBHAGUDEM VILLAGE OF JEELUGUMILLI MANDAL, WEST GODAVARI DISTRICT(PRESENTLY ELURU DISTRICT). ...PETITIONER AND 1. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY HOME DEPARTMENT, VELAGAPUDI, GUNTUR DISTRICT, A.P. 2. THE SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, WEST GODAVARI DISTRICT, A.P.(PRESENTLY ELURU DISTRICT) 3. THE STATION HOUSE OFFICER S H O, JILUGUMILLI POLICE STATION, WEST GODAVARI DISTRICT (PRESENTLY ELURU DISTRICT). 4. TATI VENKATESWARA RAO, AGED ABOUT 65 YEARS,TAPASSIVARIGUDEM DARBHAGUDEM VILLAGE OF JEELUGUMILLI MANDAL WEST GODAVARI DISTRICT (PRESENTLY ELURU DISTRICT). 5. MUMMALANENI VIJAYKUMAR, AGED ABOUT 48 YEARS5. TADUVAI CHALLAVARIGUDAM VILLAGE, JANGAREDDYGUDAM MANDAL, WEST GODAVARI DISTRICT (PRESENTLY ELURU DISTRICT). 2 6. MODIUM NAGABABU, AGED ABOUT 50 YEARS,TAPASSIVARIGUDEM DARBHAGUDEM VILLAGE OF JEELUGUMILLI MANDAL, WEST GODAVARI) DISTRICT (PRESENTLY ELURU DISTRICT. 7. MODIUM RAMESH, S/O AGED ABOUT 49 YEARS, TAPASSIVARIGUDEM, DARBHAGUDEM VILLAGE OF JEELUGUMILLI MANDAL, WEST GODAVARI DISTRICT (PRESENTLY ELURU DISTRICT). ...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue an appropriate Writ, Order or Direction, more particularly a Writ of Mandamus, declaring the inaction of Respondents 2 and 3 in not acting upon the petitioners written complaint dated 02-08-2025 as illegal, arbitrary, and violative of Articles 14, 21, and 300-A of the Constitution. Direct Respondents 2 and 3 to immediately consider the petitioner’s complaint dated 02-08-2025, register a case, conduct a fair investigation, and take necessary action strictly in accordance with law. Direct Respondents 2 and 3 not to interfere in the peaceful possession and enjoyment of the petitioners land and not to support or aid the unofficial respondents in any manner Grant police protection to the petitioner and his property from unlawful threats or intrusion by unofficial respondents Pass IA NO: 1 OF 2025 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the respondent No. 2 and 3 to act upon the complaint dated 02.08.2025, and direct the respondent no 2 and 3 not to interfere with petitioner property that is to an extent of Ac. 4.01 cents in Sy.No.84/1 of Darbhagudem village of Jelugumilli Mandal west Godavari District and protect petitioners life restrain respondents from interfering and pass Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. SUBBARAO DHULIPALLA Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. GP FOR HOME 3 THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA WRIT PETITION NO: 33757 of 2025 ORDER: This Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of Constitution of India with the following prayer for: “…pleased to issue an appropriate Writ, Order or Direction, more particularly a Writ of Mandamus, declaring the inaction of Respondent Nos.2 and 3 in not acting upon the petitioners written complaint dated 02-08-2025 as illegal, arbitrary, and violative of Articles 14, 21, and 300-A of the Constitution. Direct Respondent Nos. 2 and 3 to immediately consider the petitioner’s complaint dated 02-08-2025, register a case, conduct a fair investigation, and take necessary action strictly in accordance with law and direct Respondent Nos. 2 and 3 not to interfere in the peaceful possession and enjoyment of the petitioners land and not to support or aid the unofficial respondents in any manner Grant police protection to the petitioner and his property from unlawful threats or intrusion by unofficial respondents.…” 2. Heard Sri Subbarao Dhulipalla, learned counsel for the petitioner and Sri V.Farook, learned Assistant Government Pleader for Home for the respondents. 3. Learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that the present petition is filed seeking a direction to the respondent-police to register a case on the complaint made by the petitioner. 4. Learned Assistant Government Pleader for Home, on written instructions, would submit that on verification of records, the police have not received any complaint from the petitioner. 4 5. Recording the same, this Writ Petition is disposed of. However, the petitioner is at liberty to make a fresh representation to the police and pursue the matter. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel thereto, miscellaneous petitions pending, if any, shall stand closed. _________________________________________ Dr. JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA Date: 04.12.2025. UPS 5 HON’BLE DR. JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA W.P.No.33757 of 2025 Dated.04.12.2025 UPS 208