[2025:RJ-JP:51615] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 9978/2023 Ranveer Singh Son Of Shri Harphool Singh, Aged About 55 Years, Resident Of Village And Post Gorir, Police Station Khetri, District Jhunjhunu (Raj.) ----Petitioner Versus 1. State Of Rajasthan, Through It Joint Secretary Administration, Department Of Home (Group-11), Govt. Secretariat, Jaipur (Raj.). 2. Director General Of Police, Police Head Quarter, Lal Kothi, Jaipur (Raj.) 3. Commandant, 8Th Battalion, R.a.c. (I.r.) Gazipur, Delhi. 4. Inspector General Of Police, Armed Battalion, Jaipur (Raj.) ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Bajrang Sepat for Ms. Komal Kumari Giri For Respondent(s) : Mr. Parth Sharma for Mr. Bhuwnesh Sharma, AAG HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ASHOK KUMAR JAIN Order 18/12/2025 1. Instant writ petition is filed by the petitioner with following prayer:- “It is therefore humbly prayed that the Hon'ble court may very graciously be pleased to accept and allowed the writ petition and grant the relief prayed for as under:- i. That the Hon’ble court may kindly be pleased to issues an appropriate writ, order or direction quashing and setting aside the impugned order dated 16.02.2023 passed by respondents and respondent may kindly directed to released 3 increments of petitioner from the date of its entitlement and not took any adverse action [2025:RJ-JP:51615] (2 of 3) [CW-9978/2023] against the petitioner in the larger interest of justice. II. That any other appropriate order or direction which is deemed just and proper under the facts and circumstances of the case may kindly be issued in favour of the humble petitioner.” 2. Learned counsel for petitioner while placing reliance upon judgment in case of Raghuveer Singh Vs. State of Rajasthan & Ors.: S.B. Civil Writ Petition No.20358/2018 submits that penalty of censure does not come in the way while consideration of candidature for grant of any promotion or ACP to the petitioner by the respondents. He also placed reliance upon order dated 30.08.2024 in S.B. Civil Writ Petition No.2/2018 : Bhanwar Singh Jakhad Vs. State of Rajasthan and Ors. decided by a Co-ordinate Bench at Principal Seat, Jodhpur and submits that even in case of stoppage of one increment without cumulative effect is not affect the promotion. 3. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of learned AAG candidly admits the case of present petitioner is squarely covered with judgment in case of Raghuveer Singh Vs. State (supra) and he has no objection in case, a direction is passed for consideration of case of petitioner based on ratio in said judgments. 4. Considering submissions of learned counsel for the parties, the writ petition is disposed of in terms of the ratio laid down in case of Raghuveer Singh Vs. State (supra) and Bhanwar Singh Jakhad Vs. State of Rajasthan and Ors., if applicable upon the facts and circumstances, as claimed in the petition. The respondents shall consider and examine the case of the present petitioner in light of said judgments as and when the matter would [2025:RJ-JP:51615] (3 of 3) [CW-9978/2023] be considered for promotion or grant of ACP to the petitioner, if ratio is applicable, then same be applied. 5. With aforesaid, the instant writ petition and misc. application, if any, stands disposed of. (ASHOK KUMAR JAIN),J CHETNA BEHRANI /524