Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Rajasthan · body

2025 DAILYLAW 42549 (RAJ)

SULOCHANA MEENA D/O SHIVAJI LAL MEENA v. THE STATE OF RAJASTHAN

CW/19170/2025 · 2025-12-08

Ashok Kumar Jain

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

[2025:RJ-JP:49882] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Civil Writ Petition No.19170/2025 Sulochana Meena D/o Shivaji Lal Meena, aged about 34 years, R/o Meena Mohalla, Sankhana, Tehsil and District Tonk, Rajasthan. ----Petitioner Versus 1. The State of Rajasthan, through its Principal Education Secretary, Government Secretariat, Rajasthan, Jaipur. 2. The Director, Secondary Education, Rajasthan, Bikaner. 3. The Director, Social Justice and Empowerment Department, REIS, Room No.411, Ambedkar Bhawan, Near Civil Lines Phatak, Jaipur. 4. The District Education Officer, Secondary Education, Tonk. 5. Principal, Devnarayan Government Girls Residential School, Yusufpura, District Tonk. ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Ram Partap Saini For Respondent(s) : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ASHOK KUMAR JAIN Order 08/12/2025 1. This writ petition has been filed by the petitioner with the following prayer:- "It is therefore, most respectfully prayed that this Hon'ble court may very graciously be pleased to accept and allow this writ petition, call for the relevant record in the present matter and by issuance of an appropriate writ, order or direction: i. By issuing an appropriate writ, order or direction in the nature thereof, the Respondents may kindly be directed to give posting to the Petition at her desire in District Tonk after considering that she has complete long service of 8 year on deputation in compliance of order dated 14.12.2016 (Annex.1). ii. By issuing an appropriate writ, order or direction in the nature thereof, the Respondents may kindly be directed to give same benefit as given to the persons posted on deputation in Kasturba Gandi/Swami Vivekanand Vidyalaya for a period of 4 years by which they have been given [2025:RJ-JP:49882] (2 of 2) [CW-19170/2025] posting at the desired placed after considering long service on deputation. iii. By an appropriate writ, order and direction in the nature thereof thereby, the respondent may kindly be directed to consider the case of petitioner as law laid down by this Hon'ble High Court in the case of Pawan Meena Vs. State of Rajasthan & Ors. (SBCWP No.1665/2024) decided on 02.02.2024. iv. Any other order or direction which this Hon'ble Court may deem fit, just and proper in the facts and circumstances of this case may also be passed in favour of the Petitioner." 2. During the course of arguments, learned counsel for petitioner submits that the petitioner may be granted permission to file an appropriate representation before the respondents- Authority to consider and resolve her grievances. 3. Considered the grievance raised herein, the petitioner is at liberty to submit a representation to the respondents-Authority within a period of 30 days raising all grounds and the respondents-Authority are directed to consider and decide the representation after inquiry about grievances, raised by the petitioner but with a reasoned and speaking order within a period of 30 days from date of receipt of representation. After the decision, the respondents are under an obligation to communicate the decision to the petitioner either by way of speed post or through E-mail, if petitioner has provided E-mail in her representation. If the petitioner is still aggrieved, she is at liberty to approach this Court with fresh petition. 4. With the aforesaid directions, the present writ petition with pending application, if any, stands disposed of. (ASHOK KUMAR JAIN),J GARIMA/208