Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 42548 (AP)

Thammisetty Chinammai, v. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH

WP/31922/2025 · 2025-11-19

Venkata Jyothirmai Pratapa

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

APHC010615472025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3396] THURSDAY, THE TWENTIETH DAY OF NOVEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT HONOURABLE DR. JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA WRIT PETITION NO: 31922/2025 Between: 1. THAMMISETTY CHINAMMAI, W/O. T. VENKATESWARLU, AGED ABOUT 62 YEARS, R/. D. NO. 10-10-1, BALAYOGI NAGAR, SINGARAYAKONDA TOWN AND MANDAL, PRAKASAM DISTRICT. 2. THAMMISETTY SUBRAHMANYAM,, S/O. LATE THAMMISETTY RAMAIAH, AGED ABOUT 30 YEARS, R/. D. NO. 10-10-1, BALAYOGI NAGAR, SINGARAYAKONDA TOWN AND MANDAL, PRAKASAM DISTRICT. ...PETITIONER(S) AND 1. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP. BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, HOME DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT BUILDINGS, VELAGAPUDI, GUNTUR DISTRICT. 2. THE SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, ONGOLE, PRAKASAM DISTRICT. 3. THE CIRCLE INSPECTOR, SINGARAYAKONDA TOWN, PRAKASAM DISTRICT. 4. THE SUB INSPECTOR OF POLICE, SINGARAYAKONDA TOWN, PRAKASAM DISTRICT. 5. KUNCHALA TIRUPATHAMMA, W/O. LATE K. SUBBA RAO, AGED ABOUT 75 YEARS, R/O. BALAYOGI NAGAR, 0PP. GURUKULAPATASHALA SINGARAYAKONDA TOWN AND MANDAL, PRAKASAM DISTRICT. 6. THAMMISETTY SUBBULU, W/O. LATE SREENU, AGED ABOUT 50 YEARS, R/O. BALAYOGI NAGAR, 0PP. GURUKULAPATASHALA SINGARAYAKONDA TOWN AND MANDAL, PRAKASAM DISTRICT. 7. THAMMISETTY GOPI, S/O. LATE SREENU, AGED ABOUT 22 YEARS, R/O. BALAYOGI NAGAR, 0PP. GURUKULAPATASHALA, SINGARAYAKONDA TOWN AND MANDAL, PRAKASAM DISTRICT. 8. THAMMISETTY NAGAMANI, D/O. LATE SREENU, AGED ABOUT 25 YEARS, R/O. BALAYOGI NAGAR, 0PP. GURUKULAPATASHALA SINGARAYAKONDA TOWN AND MANDAL, PRAKASAM DISTRICT. 9. THAMMISETTY DURGA, D/O. LATE SREENU, AGED ABOUT 25 YEARS, R/O. BALAYOGI NAGAR, 0PP. GURUKULAPATASHALA 2 SINGARAYAKONDA TOWN AND MANDAL, PRAKASAM DISTRICT. 10. KUNCHALA LAKSHMI, D/O. K. SUBBARAO, AGED ABOUT 48 YEARS, R/O. BALAYOGI NAGAR, 0PP. GURUKULAPATASHALA, SINGARAYAKONDA TOWN AND MANDAL, PRAKASAM DISTRICT. 11. KUNCHALA NAGAMANI, D/O. K. SUBBARAO, AGED ABOUT 38 YEARS, R/O. BALAYOGI NAGAR, 0PP. GURUKULAPATASHALA, SINGARAYAKONDA TOWN AND MANDAL, PRAKASAM DISTRICT. 12. KUNCHALA CHINNA NAGAMANI, D/O. NOT KNOWN, AGED ABOUT 20 YEARS, R/O. BALAYOGI NAGAR, 0PP. GURUKULAPATASHALA SINGARAYAKONDA TOWN AND MANDAL, PRAKASAM DISTRICT. 13. KUNCHALA RATHNAMMA, W/O. TIRUPATAIAH, AGED ABOUT 55 YEARS, R/O. BALAYOGI NAGAR, 0PP. GURUKULAPATASHALA SINGARAYAKONDA TOWN AND MANDAL, PRAKASAM DISTRICT. 14. KUNCHALA SAI, S/O. K. TIRUPATAIAH, AGED ABOUT 25 YEARS, R/O. BALAYOGI NAGAR, 0PP. GURUKULAPATASHALA SINGARAYAKONDA TOWN AND MANDAL, PRAKASAM DISTRICT. 15. KUNCHALA BHAVANI, D/O. K. TIRUPATAIAH, AGED ABOUT 23 YEARS, R/O. BALAYOGI NAGAR, 0PP. GURUKULAPATASHALA, SINGARAYAKONDA TOWN AND MANDAL, PRAKASAM DISTRICT ...RESPONDENT(S): Counsel for the Petitioner(S): 1. R SUJAN KUMAR Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. GP FOR HOME The Court made the following: ORDER: This Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of Constitution of India with the following prayer for: “.... a Writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the 4th respondent in not registering the FIR basing on the complaint Dt. 27.09.2025 made by the petitioners against the respondent Nos. 5 to 15 is as illegal, arbitrary, violation of article 14 and 21 of Constitution of India and contrary to the BNS and consequently direct the 4th respondent to register the FIR above said complaint.” 2. Sri V.Farooq, learned Assistant Government Pleader for Home would submit that, since the contents of the complaint given by the Petitioners show 3 that the matter is of civil nature, the Police have not registered any case based on the said complaint. 3. Sri R.Sujan Kumar, learned counsel for the Petitioners would submit that the Court may pass appropriate orders. 4. Considering the submissions made, the Writ Petition is disposed of. However, Petitioners are at liberty to work out their remedies before appropriate forum in accordance with law. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel thereto, miscellaneous petitions, if any, pending shall stand closed. ________________________________________ Dr.JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA Date:20.11.2025 Dinesh 4 HON’BLE DR. JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA W.P.No.31922 of 2025 Dt.20.11.2025 Dinesh