SHAHABUDDIN @ ABBA S/O SAJAUDDIN @ TUTIYA @ SALAUDDIN v. STATE OF RAJASTHAN
CRLMB/9631/2025 · 2025-11-18
Sameer Jain
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 42545 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 42545 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
[2025:RJ-JP:46427] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 9631/2025 Shahabuddin @ Abba S/o Sajauddin @ Tutiya @ Salauddin, R/o Dadabadi At Present H. No. 134-A Behind Nagar Nigam Sajidehda P.s. Kishorpura District Kota Rajasthan. (At Present Confined At Central Jail Kota). ----Applicant Versus State Of Rajasthan, Through PP ----Respondent For Applicant(s) : Mr. Ritesh Kumawat for Mr. Abdul Kalam Khan For Respondent(s) : Ms. Arti Sharma, PP with Mr. Rhishi Raj Singh Rathore, PP HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE SAMEER JAIN
Order 18/11/2025
1. The instant bail application has been filed under Section 483 BNSS on behalf of accused-applicant. The accused-applicant was arrested in connection with FIR No.91/2025 registered at Police Station Kishorepura, District Kota City for the offence(s) under Section 8/21 of NDPS Act.
2.
Learned counsel for the applicant has submitted that the merely 13.44 gram smack was recovered from the applicant which is much below the commercial quantity as prescribed in the schedule of the NDPS Act.
3. Per contra, learned Public Prosecutor has vehemently opposed the bail application. It is submitted that though commercial quantity is minimal but there are strong criminal antecedents against the applicant.
[2025:RJ-JP:46427] (2 of 3) [CRLMB-9631/2025]
4. Criminal antecedents against the applicant is reproduced here as under:-
" Ø-la- eqdnek ua- e; Fkkuk /kkjk Lh,l ua- e; fnukad orZeku fLFkfr 1- 402@2007 Fkkuk&egkohj uxj 3@25 vk;q/k vf/kfu;e 235@2007 ltk 2- 11@2009 Fkkuk&jkeiqjk dksrokyh 376¼2½] 450] 458 Hkk-na-la-] 4@25 vk;q/k vf/kfu;e 11@2009 nks’keqDr 3- 492@2014 Fkkuk&xqekuiqjk 454] 380 Hkk-na-la- 332@2014 iSf.Max dksVZ 4- 864@2013 Fkkuk&xqekuiqjk 341] 323] 307] 34 Hkk-na-la- 563@2013 nks’keqDr 5- 408@2015 Fkkuk&xqekuiqjk 379 Hkk-na-la- 284@2015 iSf.Max dksVZ 6- 133@2016 Fkkuk&xqekuiqjk 379 Hkk-na-la- 144@2016 iSf.Max dksVZ 7- 50@2017 Fkkuk&fd”kksjiqjk 4@25 vk;q/k vf/kfu;e 36@2017 iSf.Max dksVZ 8- 130@2017 Fkkuk&fd”kksjiqjk 19@54 vkcdkjh vf/kfu;e 105@2017 iSf.Max dksVZ 9- 204@2018 Fkkuk&fd”kksjiqjk 19@54 vkcdkjh vf/kfu;e 152@2018 iSf.Max dksVZ 10- 91@2019 Fkkuk&fd”kksjiqjk 19@54 vkcdkjh vf/kfu;e 65@2019 iSf.Max dksVZ 11- 103@2021 Fkkuk&fd”kksjiqjk 4@25 vk;q/k vf/kfu;e 86@2021 iSf.Max dksVZ 12- 17@2022 Fkkuk&fd”kksjiqjk 8@27 ,uMhih,l ,DV 16@2022 iSf.Max dksVZ 13- 64@2023 Fkkuk&fd”kksjiqjk 8@27 ,uMhih,l ,DV 40@2023 iSf.Max dksVZ 14- 195@2023 Fkkuk&fd”kksjiqjk 4@25 vk;q/k vf/kfu;e 147@2023 iSf.Max dksVZ 15- 100@2024 Fkkuk&fd”kksjiqjk 8@29 ,uMhih,l ,DV 85@2024 iSf.Max dksVZ 16- 19@2025 Fkkuk&fd”kksjiqjk 8@21 ,uMhih,l ,DV 24@2025 iSf.Max dksVZ
5. Heard and considered the matter.
6. Considering the arguments advanced by counsel for the parties, the fact that the criminal antecedents are reflected from year 2007 till 2025 on each and every side like NDPS, IPC, Excise Act which are heinous in nature and the applicant is prima facie a
[2025:RJ-JP:46427] (3 of 3) [CRLMB-9631/2025] threat to the society, this Court is not inclined to enlarge the applicant on bail.
7. Accordingly, the present bail application is dismissed.
8. Concerned Jail Superintendent is directed to appoint an expert for reformation of pyscho-physical being of the applicant. It is made clear that prior to consideration of further bail application of the applicant, a certificate by the Expert so appointed shall be considered.
(SAMEER JAIN),J CHANDAN /19