118 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CRM-M-18622-2025 DATE OF DECISION: 04.04.2025 MALKIAT KUMAR AND ANOTHER ...PETITIONERS Versus STATE OF PUNJAB AND OTHERS ... RESPONDENTS CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANDEEP MOUDGIL Present: Mr.Raghav Soni, Advocate for the petitioner(s). Mr. Jaspal Singh Guru, AAG, Punjab. *** SANDEEP MOUDGIL, J (ORAL) This is a petition under Section 528 B.N.S.S. for issuance of directions to Respondents no.2 to 3 not to interfere in the peaceful life of the petitioners, especially respondent no.3 who by misusing their official position is harassing and threatening the petitioners, despite the fact that petitioners are innocent. 2. At the outset, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that he will be satisfied, in case a direction is issued to respondent No.2-the Senior Superintendent of Police, Pathankot to decide the representation dated 21.03.2025 (Annexure P-1) within a time bound manner. 3. Without adverting to the merits of the case, the respondent No.2-the Senior Superintendent of Police, Pathankot is directed to Anuradha 2025.04.05 06:36 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document CRM-M-18622-2025 -2- consider and decide the representation dated 21.03.2025 (Annexure P- 1) by passing a speaking order in accordance with law within a period of four weeks from the date of receipt of certified copy of this order. 4. A copy of order so passed be supplied to the petitioner within one week thereafter. 5. Petition stands disposed of in the aforesaid terms. (SANDEEP MOUDGIL) JUDGE 04.04.2025 anuradha Whether speaking/reasoned Yes/No Whether reportable Yes/No Anuradha 2025.04.05 06:36 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document