Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
[2025:RJ-JP:43230] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 13262/2025 Suresh Gupta S/o Ramkishore, Aged About 61 Years, R/o House No. 213, Mishrarajaji Ka Rasta, Chandpole Bazar, P.s. Kotwali, Jaipur (At Presently Confined In Central Jail Jaipur). ----Petitioner Versus State Of Rajasthan, Through Pp ----Respondent Connected With S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 13298/2025 Smt Asha Gupta W/o Suresh Gupta, R/o House No. 213, Mishrarajaji Ka Rasta, P.s. Kotwali, Jaipur (At Presently Confined In Central Jail, Jaipur). ----Petitioner Versus State Of Rajasthan, Through Pp ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Poonam Chand Sharma For Respondent(s) : Mr. Jaiprakash Tiwari, PP HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE PRAMIL KUMAR MATHUR
Order 28/10/2025
1. The petitioners have preferred these bail applications under Section 483 of BNSS in FIR No.195/2020 registered at Police Station Adarsh Nagar (Jaipur City (East), District-Jaipur City (East) for offences under Sections 420, 406 and 120B of IPC.
2. Heard learned counsel for the petitioners as well as learned Public Prosecutor and perused the material available on record.
3.
Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the petitioners have falsely been implicated in these cases. He further submitted that the allegation against the present petitioners is that they have sold the four shops to complainant without
[2025:RJ-JP:43230] (2 of 2) [CRLMB-13262/2025] disclosing the fact that above shops were mortgaged with AU Small Finance Bank, from which they had availed a loan amounting to several crores of rupees. The case is purely civil in nature. Petitioner-Suresh Gupta is behind the bars since 29.04.2025, petitioner-Smt Asha Gupta is behind the bars since
23.09.2025. Charge-sheet has been filed. The trial of the case may take considerable time, therefore, no fruitful purpose would be served by keeping the petitioners in further custody, hence, the bail applications of the petitioners may be allowed.
4. Learned Public Prosecutor has vehemently opposed the bail applications.
5. On consideration of the rival submission and material available on record and deliberating all the facts and circumstances of the case, but without expressing any opinion on the merits/demerits of the case, I am inclined to grant benefit of bail to the petitioners.
6. Accordingly, the bail applications under Section 483 B.N.S.S. are allowed and it is ordered that the petitioners-Suresh Gupta S/o Ramkishore and Smt Asha Gupta W/o Suresh Gupta shall be released on bail on their furnishing a personal bond in the sum of Rs.50,000/- with two sureties of Rs.25,000/- each of them to the satisfaction of the learned trial court for their appearance before that Court on all the dates till conclusion of the trial.
(PRAMIL KUMAR MATHUR),J Arun/169-170