Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 42530 (AP)

D. Prabhakar Naidu v. The State of Andhra Pradesh,

WP/4065/2021 · 2025-12-09

B Krishna Mohan

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

APHC010071602021 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3233] WEDNESDAY,THE TENTH DAY OF DECEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE B KRISHNA MOHAN WRIT PETITION NO: 4065/2021 Between: 1. D. PRABHAKAR NAIDU, S/O D. CHINNARAMA NAIDU, AGED ABOUT 65 YEARS, BUSINESS, R/O FLAT NO.2-C, PADMAVATHI APARTMENTS, BESIDE PANCHAYAT OFFICE, PADMAVATIPURAM, TIRUCHURU ROAD, TIRUPATHI - 517 503. CHITTOOR DISTRICT. 2. N. RAMA LAKSHMI, W/O N. BHASKARA NAIDU, AGED ABOUT 66 YEARS, HOUSE WIFE, R/O D.NO.1-39/1, SRINIVASAPURAM, NEAR RAYALASEEMA COLLEGE, TIRUCHANUR ROAD, TIRUPATHI - 517 503, CHITTOOR DISTRICT. 3. D. BHARATHI, W/O LATE D. GOPI NAIDU, AGED ABOUT 53 YEARS, HOUSE WIFE, R/O D.NO.1-41-D, M.A. RAJULAKANDRIKA VILLAGE AND POST, K.V.B. PURAM MANDAL - 517 643, CHITTOOR DISTRICT. 4. D. NIKILESH, S/O LATE D. GOPI NAIDU, AGED ABOUT 53 YEARS, HOUSE WIFE, R/O D.NO.1-41-D, M.A. RAJULAKANDRIKA VILLAGE AND POST, K.V.B. PURAM MANDAL - 517 643 CHITTOOR DISTRICT. 5. D. PURUSHOTHAM NAIDU, S/O LATE D. CHINNA RAMA NAIDU, AGED ABOUT 67 YEARS, RETD. GOVT. EMPLOYEE, R/O D.NO.EG- 714, VINAYAKA NAGAR, NEAR SAIBABA TEMPLE, THOTTAMBEDU POST AND MANDAL, CHITTOOR DISTRICT. 6. D. JAMUNAMMA, W/O LATE D. JANARDHANA NAIDU, AGED ABOUT 57 YEARS, HOUSE WIFE, R/O D.NO.1-38-A, M.A. RAJULAKANDRIKA VILLAGE AND POST, K.V.B. PURAM MANDAL - 2 HBKM,J W.P.No.4065 of 2021 517 643, CHITTOOR DISTRICT. 7. D. GUNASAGAR,, S/O LATE D. JANARDHANA NAIDU, AGED 41 YEARS, PRIVATE EMPLOYEE, R/O D.NO.1-38-A, M.A. RAJULAKANDRIKA VILLAGE AND POST, K.V.B. PURAM MANDAL - 517 643, CHITTOOR DISTRICT. 8. D. NANDA KISHORE, S/O LATE D. JANARDHANA NAIDU, AGED ABOUT 40 YEARS, PRIVATE EMPLOYEE, R/O D.NO.1-38-A, M.A. RAJULAKANDRIKA VILLAGE AND POST, K.V.B. PURAM MANDAL - 517 643, CHITTOOR DISTRICT. 9. D. MALLIKARJUN, S/O LATE D. JANARDHANA NAIDU, AGED ABOUT 34 YEARS, PRIVATE EMPLOYEE, R/O D.NO.1-38-A, M.A. RAJULAKANDRIKA VILLAGE AND POST, K.V.B. PURAM MANDAL - 517 643, CHITTOOR DISTRICT. ...PETITIONER(S) AND 1. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REVENUE DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT BUILDINGS, VELAGAPUDI, GUNTUR DISTRICT, REP. BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY. 2. THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR, CHITTOOR, CHITTOOR DISTRICT. 3. THE JOINT COLLECTOR, CHITTOOR DISTRICT. 4. THE SUB COLLECTOR, TIRUPATI, CHITTOOR DISTRICT. 5. THE REVENUE DIVISIONAL OFFICER, TIRUPATI, CHITTOOR DISTRICT. 6. THE TAHSILDAR, TIRUPATI URBAN MANDAL, CHITTOOR DISTRICT. 7. THE TIRUPATI URBAN DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY, TIRUPATI, CHITTOOR DISTRICT, REP. BY ITS VICE CHAIRMAN. ...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased topleased to issue a Writ of MANDAMUS, declaring the action of the 3 HBKM,J W.P.No.4065 of 2021 5th Respondent herein in issuing letter / instructions in Roc.D/60/2021, dated 18.01.2021, instructing the 6th Respondent herein to submit alienation proposals in respect of the lands of the Petitioners to an extent of Ac.8.35 cents, comprised in Survey No.408, situated at Settipalle Village, Tirupati Urban Mandal, Chittoor District, for the purpose of construction of Bus Stations for A.P.S.R.T.C., without issuing any prior notice or acquiring or initiating any proceedings under the Land Acquisition Act or any other Law, as illegal, arbitrary, Principal of Natural Justice and in violation of Article 14, 19(1) (g) and 300-A of Constitution of India and Consequently direct the Respondents 1 to 6 herein not to initiate any alienation proposals in respect of the lands of the Petitioners to an extent of Ac.8.35 cents, comprised in Survey No.408, situated at Settipalle Village, Tirupati Urban Mandal, Chittoor District, without acquiring the same in accordance with law and to pass IA NO: 1 OF 2021 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased pleased to Stay all further proceedings pursuant to the letter / instructions in Roc.D/60/2021, dated 18.01.2021, instructing the 6th Respondent herein to submit alienation proposals in respect of the lands of the Petitioners to an extent of Ac.8.35 cents, comprised in Survey No.408, situated at Settipalle Village, Tirupati Urban Mandal, Chittoor District, pending disposal of the above Writ Petition and pass IA NO: 2 OF 2021 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased pleased to vacate the interim orders in WP.No.4065/2021. dt: 19-02-2021 and dismiss the writ petition and pass such other Counsel for the Petitioner(S): 1. CHALASANI AJAY KUMAR Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. ADDL ADVOCATE GENERAL (AP) 2. Karri kalyan Durga Prasad SC FOR TUDA 4 HBKM,J W.P.No.4065 of 2021 The Court made the following Order: The learned counsel for the petitioners seeks permission of this Court to withdraw this writ petition, for which he has taken a Court slip dated 09.12.2025. 2. Permission is accorded. 3. Accordingly, this Writ Petition is dismissed as withdrawn. Interim order if any deemed to have been vacated. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel, Interlocutory Applications pending, if any, shall stand closed. __________________________ JUSTICE B. KRISHNA MOHAN 10.12.2025 PGT