Research › Search › Judgment

Gauhati High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 4253 (GAU)

Ige Kadu v. THE STATE OF AP and 16 Ors.

PIL/5/2023 · 2025-03-02

Mitali Thakuria, Nelson Sailo

Public Interest Litigationbody2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Page No.# 1/6 GAHC040003382023 THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) (ITANAGAR BENCH) Case No. : PIL/5/2023 Ige Kadu S/o Shri Mei Kadu, Permanent Resident of Kadu Loglu Village, PO Koyu, PS Nari Dist. Lower Siang, Arunachal Pradesh. Ph. No. 7005645519 VERSUS THE STATE OF AP and 16 Ors. Represented by the Chief Secretary, Govt. of Arunachal Pradesh, Itanagar. 2:The Commissioner Age: 0 Occupation : Vigilance Govt. of Arunachal Pradesh Itanagar AP 3:The Superintendent of Police (SP) Age: 0 Occupation : Special Investigation Cell (SIC) Arunachal Pradesh Itanagar ESS Sector Opposite Arunachal Pradesh Legislative Assembly PO/PS Itanagar Arunachal Pradesh. 4:The Officer in Charge Age: 0 Occupation : Special Investigation Cell (SIC) Arunachal Pradesh Itanagar Page No.# 2/6 ESS Sector Opposite Arunachal Pradesh Legislative Assembly PO/PS Itanagar Arunachal Pradesh. 5:Kento Rina Age: 0 Occupation : Hon'ble Member Legislative Assembly (MLA) 36 Nari Koyu (ST) Assembly Constituency Lower Siang District C/o Secretary Arunachal Pradesh Legislative Assembly Itanagar PO/PS Itanagar Arunachal Pradesh. 6:M/s Ngarsee Torio Enterprises Age: 0 Occupation : Represented by Sole Proprietor Shri Toge Rina S/o Shri Kento Rina Village Rina PO Koyu PS Nari District East Siang Arunachal Pradesh. 7:Toge Rina Age: 0 Occupation : S/o Shri Kento Rena Village Rina PO Koyu PS Nari District East Siang Arunachal Pradesh PIN 791102 8:M/s T. R. Enterprises Age: 0 Occupation : Represented by Sole Proprietor Shri Tami Ringu S/o Tamar Ringu Village Kora PO Kora PS Nari Lower Siang District Page No.# 3/6 Arunachal Pradesh. 9:Tami Ringu Age: 0 Occupation : S/o Shri Tamar Ringu Village Kora PO Kora PS Nari Lower Siang District Arunachal Pradesh. 10:M/s Sipi Construction Age: 0 Occupation : Represented by Sole Proprietor Shri Miding Moyong S/o Shri Kaling Moyong Village Mirsam PO/PS Pasighat East Siang District Arunachal Pradesh. 11:Miding Moyong Age: 0 Occupation : S/o Shri Kaling Moyong Village Mirsam PO/PS Pasighat East Siang District Arunachal Pradesh. 12:Tadam Kamcham Age: 0 Occupation : Executive Engineer Water Resources Division Likabali Division District Lower Siang Arunachal Pradesh. 13:Marngu Ringu Age: 0 Occupation : Assistant Engineer Water Resources Division Page No.# 4/6 Nari Koyu Sub Division District Lower Siang Arunachal Pradesh. 14:Deli Kambu Age: 0 Occupation : Executive Engineer Rural Work Department Likabali Division District Lower Siang Arunachal Pradesh. 15:Mari Basar Age: 0 Occupation : Assistant Engineer Rural Work Department Nari Sub Division District Lower Siang Arunachal Pradesh. 16:The Commissioner/Secretary Age: 0 Occupation : Rural Works Department Govt. of Arunachal Pradesh Itanagar PO/PS Itanagar Arunachal Pradesh. 17:The Commissioner/Secretary Age: 0 Occupation : Water Resource Department Govt. of Arunachal Pradesh Itanagar PO/PS Itanagar Arunachal Pradesh Advocate for the Petitioner : Nikita Danggen, Oken Duggong,P Siga,Y Dagiam,Honi Tana Tara Advocate for the Respondent : GA (AP), Gimi Tarak,Ojing Pada,SC (SIC),SC(RWD),Taba Tagum,Likha Tabin,R koyu Page No.# 5/6 BEFORE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE NELSON SAILO HONOURABLE MRS. JUSTICE MITALI THAKURIA ORDER Date : 03.03.2025 (N. Sailo, J.) Heard Ms. N. Danggen, learned counsel for the petitioner, who submits that the petitioner is a public spirited person who has filed the instant PIL as no action was taken against the private respondents, who according to him are involved in certain misappropriation of fund. Mr. R. H. Nabam, learned Additional Advocate General appearing for the State respondents, submits that preliminary investigation in the matter is being carried out and it is only within a matter of time that the same would be concluded. He further submits that if there is any incriminating material against the private respondents, the respondent authorities will definitely look into the matter and take appropriate action. Mr. O. Pada, learned Standing Counsel for the SIC appears on behalf of the respondents No.3 and 4; Mr. T. Tagum, learned counsel for the respondents No.12 to 15 and Mr. G. Tarak, learned Standing Counsel for the Rural Works Department, representing respondent No.16. Considering the fact that the respondents are conducting preliminarily investigation, we are of the considered opinion that the purpose of instant PIL has been served at this stage. It is, however, observe that the respondent authorities concerned shall complete the investigation and take the same to its logical conclusion in accordance with law. Page No.# 6/6 With the above observation, the instant PIL stands disposed of. JUDGE JUDGE Comparing Assistant